share_log

Zhongfu Information Inc. (SZSE:300659) Insiders Have Significant Skin in the Game With 38% Ownership

Zhongfu Information Inc. (SZSE:300659) Insiders Have Significant Skin in the Game With 38% Ownership

中富信息公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:300659)內部人士擁有大量股份,所有權爲38%
Simply Wall St ·  04/02 18:59

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Zhongfu Information implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in Zhongfu Information is 13%
  • 對中富信息的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
  • 共有7名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 中富信息的機構所有權爲13%

If you want to know who really controls Zhongfu Information Inc. (SZSE:300659), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 38% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着中富信息有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:300659),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有38%所有權的個人內部人士。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

With such a notable stake in the company, insiders would be highly incentivised to make value accretive decisions.

由於該公司持有如此可觀的股份,內部人士將極大地激勵他們做出增值決策。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Zhongfu Information, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究中富信息的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300659 Ownership Breakdown April 2nd 2024
SZSE: 300659 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 2 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhongfu Information?

關於中富信息,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Zhongfu Information. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Zhongfu Information's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者持有中富信息的相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到中富信息的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300659 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 2nd 2024
深圳證券交易所:300659 2024年4月2日收益和收入增長

Zhongfu Information is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Dong Xiao Wei with 25% of shares outstanding. Zhi Jiang Chen is the second largest shareholder owning 14% of common stock, and Zhonggeng Fund Management Co., Ltd. holds about 3.3% of the company stock.

中富信息不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是首席執行官董小衛,其已發行股份的25%。Zhi Jiang Chen是第二大股東,擁有14%的普通股,中庚基金管理有限公司持有公司約3.3%的股份。

We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前7名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Zhongfu Information

中富信息的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Zhongfu Information Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥4.4b, and insiders have CN¥1.7b worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎擁有中富信息公司的很大一部分股份。它的市值僅爲4.4億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值17億元人民幣的股票。我們可以說這表明了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能已經創立了該公司。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 31% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司31%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Zhongfu Information better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Zhongfu Information (including 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解中富信息,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該了解我們在中富信息中發現的3個警告信號(包括一個對我們來說不太合適)。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我們免費收集的具有良好財務狀況的有趣潛在客戶。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論