share_log

Sprocomm Intelligence Limited's (HKG:1401) CEO Chengjun Li Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 26% Last Week

Sprocomm Intelligence Limited's (HKG:1401) CEO Chengjun Li Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 26% Last Week

Sprocomm Intelligence Limited(HKG: 1401)首席執行官李成軍是最樂觀的內部人士,他們的持股量上週增長了26%
Simply Wall St ·  03/29 18:48

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Sprocomm Intelligence implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 2 shareholders own 67% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 對Sprocomm Intelligence的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
  • 前兩名股東擁有公司67%的股份
  • 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有一個很好的了解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Sprocomm Intelligence Limited (HKG:1401), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 67% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了Sprocomm Intelligence Limited(HKG: 1401),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有公司股份最多的集團是內部人士,準確地說約爲67%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by HK$550m last week.

顯然,上週該公司的市值上漲了5.5億港元之後,內部人士受益最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Sprocomm Intelligence.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Sprocomm Intelligence的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:1401 Ownership Breakdown March 29th 2024
SEHK: 1401 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 29 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sprocomm Intelligence?

關於Sprocomm Intelligence,缺乏機構所有權能告訴我們什麼?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活躍的小公司通常缺少機構投資者,但是沒有機構投資者的大公司並不常見。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Sprocomm Intelligence might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

公司在股票登記處可能沒有任何機構的原因有很多。如果流動性(每天交易的股票數量)低,機構可能很難購買大量股票。如果公司不需要籌集資金,機構可能缺乏建立立場的機會。另一方面,專業投資者總是有可能避開一家公司,因爲他們認爲這不是賺錢的最佳去處。Sprocomm Intelligence可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的業績,或者他們可能根本沒有仔細研究該業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:1401 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 29th 2024
SEHK: 1401 2024年3月29日收益和收入增長

Sprocomm Intelligence is not owned by hedge funds. With a 37% stake, CEO Chengjun Li is the largest shareholder. Bin Xiong is the second largest shareholder owning 31% of common stock, and Jz Capital Limited holds about 6.5% of the company stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Bin Xiong is also Senior Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

Sprocomm Intelligence 不歸對沖基金所有。首席執行官李成軍持有37%的股份,是最大股東。熊斌是第二大股東,擁有31%的普通股,Jz Capital Limited持有公司約6.5%的股份。有趣的是,第二大股東熊斌也是高級主要高管,這再次表明公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 67% stake.

對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,兩名最大股東通過其67%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Sprocomm Intelligence

Sprocomm 情報的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Sprocomm Intelligence Limited stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own HK$1.8b worth of shares in the HK$2.7b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

內部人士似乎擁有Sprocomm Intelligence Limited一半以上的股票。這賦予了他們很大的力量。這意味着他們擁有這家27億港元公司價值18億港元的股份。這很有意義。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sprocomm Intelligence. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Sprocomm Intelligence擁有26%的所有權,主要是個人投資者,對Sprocomm Intelligence有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.5%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司6.5%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Sprocomm Intelligence you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。一個很好的例子:我們已經發現了兩個你應該注意的Sprocomm Intelligence警告信號。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,來看看這份有趣的公司的免費清單吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論