share_log

As Kellanova (NYSE:K) Advances 3.7% This Past Week, Investors May Now Be Noticing the Company's One-year Earnings Growth

As Kellanova (NYSE:K) Advances 3.7% This Past Week, Investors May Now Be Noticing the Company's One-year Earnings Growth

隨着凱拉諾瓦(紐約證券交易所代碼:K)上週上漲3.7%,投資者現在可能會注意到該公司一年的收益增長
Simply Wall St ·  03/24 08:59

It's easy to match the overall market return by buying an index fund. But if you buy individual stocks, you can do both better or worse than that. Investors in Kellanova (NYSE:K) have tasted that bitter downside in the last year, as the share price dropped 15%. That's well below the market return of 33%. Even if shareholders bought some time ago, they wouldn't be particularly happy: the stock is down 13% in three years.

通過購買指數基金很容易匹配整體市場回報。但是,如果你買入個股,你的表現可能比這更好或更差。去年,由於股價下跌了15%,凱拉諾瓦(紐約證券交易所代碼:K)的投資者已經嚐到了這種痛苦的下行空間。這遠低於33%的市場回報率。即使股東前段時間買入,他們也不會特別高興:該股在三年內下跌了13%。

Although the past week has been more reassuring for shareholders, they're still in the red over the last year, so let's see if the underlying business has been responsible for the decline.

儘管過去一週令股東更加放心,但與去年相比,他們仍處於虧損狀態,所以讓我們看看基礎業務是否是造成下降的原因。

While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

儘管一些人繼續教導高效市場假說,但事實證明,市場是反應過度的動態系統,投資者並不總是理性的。評估公司情緒變化的一種有缺陷但合理的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。

During the unfortunate twelve months during which the Kellanova share price fell, it actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 5.0%. Of course, the situation might betray previous over-optimism about growth.

在凱拉諾瓦股價下跌的不幸十二個月中,其每股收益(EPS)實際上增長了5.0%。當然,這種情況可能會暴露先前對增長的過度樂觀。

By glancing at these numbers, we'd posit that the the market had expectations of much higher growth, last year. But looking to other metrics might better explain the share price change.

通過瀏覽這些數字,我們可以假設去年市場對更高的增長抱有預期。但是,看看其他指標可能會更好地解釋股價的變化。

Vibrant companies don't usually cut their dividends, so the recent reduction might help explain why the Kellanova share price has been weak.

充滿活力的公司通常不會削減股息,因此最近的下調可能有助於解釋凱拉諾瓦股價疲軟的原因。

You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).

您可以在下面看到收入和收入如何隨着時間的推移而變化(點擊圖片了解確切的值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:K Earnings and Revenue Growth March 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:英國收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 24 日

Kellanova is a well known stock, with plenty of analyst coverage, suggesting some visibility into future growth. Given we have quite a good number of analyst forecasts, it might be well worth checking out this free chart depicting consensus estimates.

Kellanova是一隻知名股票,分析師報道豐富,這表明未來增長有一定的可見性。鑑於我們有相當多的分析師預測,這張描繪共識估計的免費圖表可能值得一看。

What About Dividends?

分紅呢?

As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. In the case of Kellanova, it has a TSR of -5.9% for the last 1 year. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!

除了衡量股價回報率外,投資者還應考慮股東總回報率(TSR)。儘管股價回報率僅反映股價的變化,但股東總回報率包括股息的價值(假設已進行再投資)以及任何折扣融資或分拆的收益。可以說,股東總回報率更全面地描述了股票產生的回報。就凱拉諾娃而言,在過去一年的股東總回報率爲-5.9%。這超過了我們之前提到的其股價回報率。這在很大程度上是其股息支付的結果!

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

While the broader market gained around 33% in the last year, Kellanova shareholders lost 5.9% (even including dividends). However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 4% per year over half a decade. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Kellanova better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Kellanova .

儘管去年整體市場上漲了約33%,但凱拉諾瓦的股東損失了5.9%(甚至包括股息)。但是,請記住,即使是最好的股票有時也會在十二個月內表現不如市場。好的一面是,長期股東賺了錢,在過去的五年中,每年增長4%。最近的拋售可能是一個機會,因此可能值得查看基本面數據以尋找長期增長趨勢的跡象。長期跟蹤股價表現總是很有意思的。但是,爲了更好地了解凱拉諾娃,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該注意我們在凱拉諾娃身上發現的兩個警告信號。

But note: Kellanova may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast).

但請注意:凱拉諾瓦可能不是最值得購買的股票。因此,來看看這份過去盈利增長(以及進一步增長預測)的有趣公司的免費清單。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論