share_log

Institutional Investors in Magnite, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGNI) See US$97m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in Magnite, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGNI) See US$97m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Magnite, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:MGNI)的機構投資者上週的市值減少了9700萬美元,儘管長期收益使他們受益。
Simply Wall St ·  03/22 06:33

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Magnite implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構對Magnite的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

Every investor in Magnite, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGNI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 76% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Magnite, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:MGNI)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有76%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 6.1% in value last week. Still, the 15% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中蒙受損失,尤其是上週持股價值下降6.1%的機構投資者。儘管如此,15%的一年期漲幅可能有助於減輕他們的總體虧損。但是,他們應該注意未來的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Magnite.

在下圖中,我們放大了Magnite的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:MGNI Ownership Breakdown March 22nd 2024
納斯達克GS:MGNI 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Magnite?

關於Magnite,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Magnite does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Magnite's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,Magnite確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Magnite的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:MGNI Earnings and Revenue Growth March 22nd 2024
納斯達克GS:2024年3月22日MGNI收益和收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Magnite. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.0% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.8% and 7.2% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Michael Barrett is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。對沖基金在Magnite的股票不多。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股東,已發行股份爲9.0%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.8%和7.2%的股份。此外,首席執行官邁克爾·巴雷特持有該公司0.6%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前十名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Magnite

內幕人士對 Magnite 的所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Magnite, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$34m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Magnite, Inc.的股份。內部人士持有價值3400萬美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司13%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 8.9%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的8.9%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Magnite that you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們已經確定了兩個你應該注意的 Magnite 警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論