share_log

PCCW Limited's (HKG:8) Top Owners Are Retail Investors With 42% Stake, While 41% Is Held by Public Companies

PCCW Limited's (HKG:8) Top Owners Are Retail Investors With 42% Stake, While 41% Is Held by Public Companies

電訊盈科有限公司(HKG: 8)的最大股東是散戶投資者,持有42%的股份,而41%的股份由上市公司持有
Simply Wall St ·  03/21 18:02

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • PCCW's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Institutions own 10% of PCCW
  • 電訊盈科擁有大量散戶投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 50% 的業務由前四名股東持有
  • 機構擁有電訊盈科10%的股份

To get a sense of who is truly in control of PCCW Limited (HKG:8), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 42% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了電訊盈科有限公司(HKG: 8),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有42%所有權的散戶投資者。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Meanwhile, public companies make up 41% of the company's shareholders.

同時,上市公司佔公司股東的41%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about PCCW.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於電訊盈科的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:8 Ownership Breakdown March 21st 2024
SEHK: 8 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PCCW?

關於電訊盈科,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

PCCW already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of PCCW, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

PCCW已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查PCCW過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:8 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 21st 2024
香港交易所:8 2024年3月21日的收益和收入增長

PCCW is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Pacific Century Regional Developments Limited with 23% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 18% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.9% by the third-largest shareholder. Tzar Kai Li, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

PCCW不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是太平洋世紀區域發展有限公司,已發行股份的23%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約18%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有6.9%的所有權。第三大股東沙皇凱利也恰好擁有董事會主席的頭銜。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制着公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of PCCW

電訊盈科的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in PCCW Limited. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth HK$2.1b. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有電訊盈科有限公司的股份。內部人士持有價值21億港元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 42% stake in PCCW. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有電訊盈科42%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 41% of the PCCW shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們可以看到,上市公司持有電訊盈科41%的已發行股份。很難肯定地說,但這表明它們將商業利益交織在一起。這可能是一個戰略利害關係,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變動。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand PCCW better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with PCCW (including 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解PCCW,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該了解我們在PCCW上發現的兩個警告信號(包括一個對我們來說不太合適)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論