share_log

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Colgate-Palmolive Company (NYSE:CL) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Colgate-Palmolive Company (NYSE:CL) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

高露潔棕欖公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CL)擁有83%的股票所有權,主要由機構所有者主導
Simply Wall St ·  03/21 11:14

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Colgate-Palmolive implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構持有高露潔棕欖的大量股權意味着它們對該公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 50% 的業務由前 25 名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Colgate-Palmolive Company (NYSE:CL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了高露潔棕欖公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CL),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。機構擁有83%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Colgate-Palmolive.

在下圖中,我們放大了高露潔棕欖的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:CL Ownership Breakdown March 21st 2024
紐約證券交易所:CL 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Colgate-Palmolive?

機構所有權告訴我們關於高露潔棕欖的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Colgate-Palmolive does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Colgate-Palmolive's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,高露潔棕欖確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看高露潔棕欖的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:CL Earnings and Revenue Growth March 21st 2024
紐約證券交易所:CL 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 21 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Colgate-Palmolive is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.7% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.8% and 5.8% of the stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。高露潔棕欖不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其已發行股份爲9.7%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約6.8%和5.8%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現25位大股東共同擁有的股份不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Colgate-Palmolive

高露潔棕欖的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Colgate-Palmolive Company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$77m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有高露潔棕欖公司不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士擁有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值7700萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人士是在買入還是賣出可能會更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Colgate-Palmolive. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有高露潔棕欖17%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Colgate-Palmolive better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Colgate-Palmolive you should know about.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解高露潔棕橄欖,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了兩個你應該知道的高露潔棕欖警告標誌。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論