share_log

The Three-year Underlying Earnings Growth at Shutterstock (NYSE:SSTK) Is Promising, but the Shareholders Are Still in the Red Over That Time

The Three-year Underlying Earnings Growth at Shutterstock (NYSE:SSTK) Is Promising, but the Shareholders Are Still in the Red Over That Time

Shutterstock(紐約證券交易所代碼:SSTK)的三年基礎收益增長令人鼓舞,但在此期間,股東仍處於虧損狀態
Simply Wall St ·  03/17 09:40

Many investors define successful investing as beating the market average over the long term. But its virtually certain that sometimes you will buy stocks that fall short of the market average returns. We regret to report that long term Shutterstock, Inc. (NYSE:SSTK) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 46% in three years, versus a market return of about 22%. The more recent news is of little comfort, with the share price down 29% in a year.

許多投資者將成功的投資定義爲長期超過市場平均水平。但幾乎可以肯定的是,有時候你會買入低於市場平均回報率的股票。我們遺憾地報告,Shutterstock, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:SSTK)的長期股東有過這樣的經歷,股價在三年內下跌了46%,而市場回報率約爲22%。最近的消息並不令人欣慰,股價在一年內下跌了29%。

With the stock having lost 3.6% in the past week, it's worth taking a look at business performance and seeing if there's any red flags.

由於該股在過去一週下跌了3.6%,值得一看業務表現,看看是否有任何危險信號。

There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

不可否認,市場有時是有效的,但價格並不總是能反映潛在的業務表現。評估公司情緒變化的一種有缺陷但合理的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。

During the unfortunate three years of share price decline, Shutterstock actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 16% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or else the company was over-hyped in the past, and so its growth has disappointed.

在不幸的三年股價下跌中,Shutterstock的每股收益(EPS)實際上每年增長16%。鑑於股價的反應,人們可能會懷疑每股收益並不能很好地指導該期間的業務表現(可能是由於一次性的虧損或收益)。否則,該公司過去曾被過度炒作,因此其增長令人失望。

It's worth taking a look at other metrics, because the EPS growth doesn't seem to match with the falling share price.

值得一看其他指標,因爲每股收益的增長似乎與股價的下跌不符。

We note that, in three years, revenue has actually grown at a 8.6% annual rate, so that doesn't seem to be a reason to sell shares. This analysis is just perfunctory, but it might be worth researching Shutterstock more closely, as sometimes stocks fall unfairly. This could present an opportunity.

我們注意到,在三年內,收入實際上以8.6%的年增長率增長,因此這似乎不是出售股票的理由。這種分析只是敷衍了事,但可能值得對Shutterstock進行更仔細的研究,因爲有時股票會不公平地下跌。這可能帶來機會。

The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).

公司的收入和收益(隨着時間的推移)如下圖所示(點擊查看確切數字)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SSTK Earnings and Revenue Growth March 17th 2024
紐約證券交易所:SSTK收益和收入增長 2024年3月17日

We know that Shutterstock has improved its bottom line lately, but what does the future have in store? If you are thinking of buying or selling Shutterstock stock, you should check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

我們知道Shutterstock最近提高了利潤,但是未來會發生什麼?如果您正在考慮買入或賣出Shutterstock股票,則應查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

What About Dividends?

分紅呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. We note that for Shutterstock the TSR over the last 3 years was -44%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

在考慮投資回報時,重要的是要考慮兩者之間的區別 股東總回報 (TSR) 和 股價回報。股東總回報率是一種回報計算方法,它考慮了現金分紅的價值(假設收到的任何股息都經過再投資)以及任何貼現資本籌集和分拆的計算價值。可以說,股東總回報率更全面地描述了股票產生的回報。我們注意到,Shutterstock在過去3年的股東總回報率爲-44%,好於上述股價回報率。而且,猜測股息支付在很大程度上解釋了這種分歧是沒有好處的!

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

While the broader market gained around 32% in the last year, Shutterstock shareholders lost 27% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 3% per year over half a decade. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Shutterstock .

儘管去年整體市場上漲了約32%,但Shutterstock的股東損失了27%(甚至包括股息)。即使是優質股票的股價有時也會下跌,但我們希望在過於感興趣之前看到企業基本指標的改善。好的一面是,長期股東賺了錢,在過去的五年中,每年增長3%。最近的拋售可能是一個機會,因此可能值得查看基本面數據以尋找長期增長趨勢的跡象。儘管市場狀況可能對股價產生的不同影響值得考慮,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲此,你應該注意我們在Shutterstock上發現的1個警告標誌。

We will like Shutterstock better if we see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of growing companies with considerable, recent, insider buying.

如果我們看到一些重大的內幕收購,我們會更喜歡Shutterstock。在我們等待的同時,請查看這份免費清單,列出了最近有大量內幕收購的成長型公司。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論