share_log

Lakeland Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:LKFN) Recent 5.8% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

Lakeland Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:LKFN) Recent 5.8% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

萊克蘭金融公司(納斯達克股票代碼:LKFN)最近5.8%的回調增加了爲期一年的虧損,機構所有者可能會採取嚴厲措施
Simply Wall St ·  03/15 07:22

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lakeland Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 高機構所有權意味着Lakeland Financial的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 51% 的業務由前 9 名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

If you want to know who really controls Lakeland Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:LKFN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了萊克蘭金融公司(納斯達克股票代碼:LKFN),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。機構擁有83%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.6b last week after a 5.8% drop in the share price. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 7.6% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. Hence, if weakness in Lakeland Financial's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

因此,上週該公司的市值在股價下跌5.8%後跌至16億美元,因此機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。毋庸置疑,最近的虧損進一步加劇了7.6%的股東一年虧損,下降幅度可能不大,尤其是對於這類股東而言。機構或 “流動性提供者” 控制着大量資金,因此,這些類型的投資者通常對股價走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果Lakeland Financial的股價持續疲軟,機構投資者可能會感到不得不出售該股票,這對於個人投資者來說可能並不理想。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lakeland Financial, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Lakeland Financial的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:LKFN Ownership Breakdown March 15th 2024
NASDAQGS: LKFN 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 15 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lakeland Financial?

關於萊克蘭金融,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lakeland Financial. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lakeland Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者持有萊克蘭金融的相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Lakeland Financial的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:LKFN Earnings and Revenue Growth March 15th 2024
納斯達克GS: LKFN收益和收入增長 2024年3月15日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Lakeland Financial is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.2% and 6.4% of the stock. In addition, we found that David Findlay, the CEO has 0.5% of the shares allocated to their name.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。萊克蘭金融不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大股東,已發行股份的15%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.2%和6.4%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官戴維·芬德利以其名義分配了0.5%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前9名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Lakeland Financial

萊克蘭金融的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Lakeland Financial Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$47m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有萊克蘭金融公司的股份。內部人士持有價值4700萬美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 14% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lakeland Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Lakeland Financial擁有14%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對萊克蘭金融有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Lakeland Financial (1 is significant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了 Lakeland Financial 的 2 個警告信號(1 個很重要!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論