share_log

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders Still Have the Largest Holding in Freedom Holding Corp. (NASDAQ:FRHC) With a 71% Ownership

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders Still Have the Largest Holding in Freedom Holding Corp. (NASDAQ:FRHC) With a 71% Ownership

儘管最近出現拋售,但業內人士仍持有自由控股公司(納斯達克股票代碼:FRHC)的最大股份,所有權爲71%
Simply Wall St ·  03/13 09:47

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Freedom Holding's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 71% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Timur Turlov)
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • Freedom Holding擁有大量內部所有權,這表明公司擴張有固有的利益
  • 公司71%的股份由單一股東持有(鐵木爾·圖洛夫)
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

A look at the shareholders of Freedom Holding Corp. (NASDAQ:FRHC) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 71% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看自由控股公司(納斯達克股票代碼:FRHC)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。個人內部人士持有71%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Even though insiders have sold shares recently, the group owns the most numbers of shares in the company.

儘管內部人士最近出售了股票,但該集團擁有該公司最多的股份。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Freedom Holding, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Freedom Holding的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:FRHC Ownership Breakdown March 13th 2024
納斯達克公司:FRHC 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Freedom Holding?

關於自由控股,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Less than 5% of Freedom Holding is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

自由控股公司只有不到5%的股份由機構投資者持有。這表明一些基金將目光投向了該公司,但許多基金尚未購買該公司的股票。因此,如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移而有所改善,那麼將來我們很可能會看到更多的機構買家。當一些大型機構想同時購買某隻股票時,我們有時會看到股價上漲。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的歷史可能有助於考慮是否會有更多的機構投資者想要這隻股票。當然,還有很多其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:FRHC Earnings and Revenue Growth March 13th 2024
納斯達克公司:FRHC 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 13 日

Freedom Holding is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Timur Turlov is the largest shareholder with 71% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. It's usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider with such skin in the game. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 0.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 0.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Askar Tashtitov is also President, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

自由控股不歸對沖基金所有。該公司首席執行官鐵木爾·圖爾洛夫是最大股東,已發行股份爲71%。憑藉如此巨額的股份,我們推斷他們對公司的未來擁有重大控制權。當內部人士擁有公司的大量股份時,這通常被認爲是一個好兆頭,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到一位擁有如此風險的公司內部人士。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約0.2%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有0.1%的所有權。有趣的是,第二大股東阿斯卡爾·塔什蒂托夫再次擔任總裁,他指出公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Freedom Holding

自由控股的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Freedom Holding Corp.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of US$4.4b, that means insiders have a whopping US$3.2b worth of shares in their own names. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if they have been selling down their stake.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有自由控股公司的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決策。鑑於其市值爲44億美元,這意味着內部人士以自己的名義擁有高達32億美元的股票。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示出與股東的強烈一致性。您可以點擊此處查看他們是否一直在出售其股份。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司27%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Freedom Holding better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地理解自由控股公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

許多人發現,深入了解一家公司過去的表現很有用。您可以訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的詳細圖表。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我們免費收集的具有良好財務狀況的有趣潛在客戶。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論