share_log

Are The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc.'s (NYSE:NAPA) Fundamentals Good Enough to Warrant Buying Given The Stock's Recent Weakness?

Are The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc.'s (NYSE:NAPA) Fundamentals Good Enough to Warrant Buying Given The Stock's Recent Weakness?

是 Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc. '鑑於該股最近的疲軟,s(紐約證券交易所代碼:NAPA)的基本面足夠好,足以值得買入?
Simply Wall St ·  03/10 10:57

It is hard to get excited after looking at Duckhorn Portfolio's (NYSE:NAPA) recent performance, when its stock has declined 9.8% over the past week. But if you pay close attention, you might find that its key financial indicators look quite decent, which could mean that the stock could potentially rise in the long-term given how markets usually reward more resilient long-term fundamentals. Particularly, we will be paying attention to Duckhorn Portfolio's ROE today.

看了Duckhorn Portfolio(紐約證券交易所代碼:NAPA)最近的表現,很難感到興奮,當時其股票在過去一週下跌了9.8%。但是,如果你密切關注,你可能會發現其關鍵財務指標看起來相當不錯,考慮到市場通常會獎勵更具彈性的長期基本面,這可能意味着該股有可能在長期內上漲。特別是,我們今天將關注達克霍恩投資組合的投資回報率。

Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.

股本回報率或投資回報率是對公司增值和管理投資者資金的有效性的考驗。簡而言之,它用於評估公司相對於其股權資本的盈利能力。

How Is ROE Calculated?

ROE 是如何計算的?

The formula for return on equity is:

股本回報率的公式是:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

股本回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營業務)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Duckhorn Portfolio is:

因此,根據上述公式,達克霍恩投資組合的投資回報率爲:

6.8% = US$66m ÷ US$977m (Based on the trailing twelve months to January 2024).

6.8% = 6600萬美元 ÷ 9.77億美元(基於截至2024年1月的過去十二個月)。

The 'return' is the income the business earned over the last year. So, this means that for every $1 of its shareholder's investments, the company generates a profit of $0.07.

“回報” 是企業在過去一年中獲得的收入。因此,這意味着其股東每投資1美元,公司就會產生0.07美元的利潤。

What Has ROE Got To Do With Earnings Growth?

投資回報率與收益增長有什麼關係?

Thus far, we have learned that ROE measures how efficiently a company is generating its profits. Depending on how much of these profits the company reinvests or "retains", and how effectively it does so, we are then able to assess a company's earnings growth potential. Generally speaking, other things being equal, firms with a high return on equity and profit retention, have a higher growth rate than firms that don't share these attributes.

到目前爲止,我們已經了解到,投資回報率衡量的是公司創造利潤的效率。然後,我們能夠評估公司的收益增長潛力,具體取決於公司對這些利潤進行再投資或 “保留” 了多少及其有效性。一般而言,在其他條件相同的情況下,股本回報率和利潤留存率高的公司的增長率要高於不具有這些屬性的公司。

A Side By Side comparison of Duckhorn Portfolio's Earnings Growth And 6.8% ROE

Duckhorn Portfolio的收益增長和6.8%的投資回報率的並排比較

At first glance, Duckhorn Portfolio's ROE doesn't look very promising. Next, when compared to the average industry ROE of 18%, the company's ROE leaves us feeling even less enthusiastic. However, the moderate 17% net income growth seen by Duckhorn Portfolio over the past five years is definitely a positive. We reckon that there could be other factors at play here. For instance, the company has a low payout ratio or is being managed efficiently.

乍一看,達克霍恩投資組合的投資回報率看起來並不十分樂觀。接下來,與18%的行業平均投資回報率相比,該公司的投資回報率使我們感到不那麼熱情。但是,在過去五年中,Duckhorn Portfolio實現了17%的溫和淨收入增長,這絕對是積極的。我們認爲這裏可能還有其他因素在起作用。例如,該公司的派息率較低或管理效率很高。

We then compared Duckhorn Portfolio's net income growth with the industry and we're pleased to see that the company's growth figure is higher when compared with the industry which has a growth rate of 7.1% in the same 5-year period.

然後,我們將Duckhorn Portfolio的淨收入增長與該行業進行了比較,我們很高興地看到,與同期5年同期增長率爲7.1%的行業相比,該公司的增長數字更高。

past-earnings-growth
NYSE:NAPA Past Earnings Growth March 10th 2024
紐約證券交易所:NAPA過去的收益增長 2024年3月10日

The basis for attaching value to a company is, to a great extent, tied to its earnings growth. The investor should try to establish if the expected growth or decline in earnings, whichever the case may be, is priced in. This then helps them determine if the stock is placed for a bright or bleak future. What is NAPA worth today? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether NAPA is currently mispriced by the market.

爲公司附加價值的基礎在很大程度上與其收益增長息息相關。無論如何,投資者應設法確定預期的收益增長或下降是否已計入其中。然後,這可以幫助他們確定股票是爲光明還是暗淡的未來而佈局。今天的 NAPA 值多少錢?我們的免費研究報告中的內在價值信息圖有助於可視化市場目前是否對NAPA進行了錯誤的定價。

Is Duckhorn Portfolio Using Its Retained Earnings Effectively?

Duckhorn投資組合是否有效地使用了其留存收益?

Given that Duckhorn Portfolio doesn't pay any dividend to its shareholders, we infer that the company has been reinvesting all of its profits to grow its business.

鑑於Duckhorn Portfolio不向其股東支付任何股息,我們推斷該公司一直在將其所有利潤再投資以發展業務。

Conclusion

結論

Overall, we feel that Duckhorn Portfolio certainly does have some positive factors to consider. Even in spite of the low rate of return, the company has posted impressive earnings growth as a result of reinvesting heavily into its business. On studying current analyst estimates, we found that analysts expect the company to continue its recent growth streak. Are these analysts expectations based on the broad expectations for the industry, or on the company's fundamentals? Click here to be taken to our analyst's forecasts page for the company.

總體而言,我們認爲Duckhorn Portfolio確實有一些積極因素需要考慮。儘管回報率很低,但由於對業務進行了大量再投資,該公司的收益增長令人印象深刻。在研究分析師當前的估計時,我們發現分析師預計該公司將繼續保持最近的增長勢頭。這些分析師的預期是基於對該行業的廣泛預期,還是基於公司的基本面?點擊此處進入我們分析師對公司的預測頁面。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論