share_log

With 77% Ownership of the Shares, Brady Corporation (NYSE:BRC) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 77% Ownership of the Shares, Brady Corporation (NYSE:BRC) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

布雷迪公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:BRC)擁有77%的股票所有權,主要由機構所有者主導
Simply Wall St ·  03/09 08:05

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Brady implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構對布雷迪的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價有重大影響
  • 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

Every investor in Brady Corporation (NYSE:BRC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 77% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

布雷迪公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:BRC)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲77%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲理想的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Brady, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下表開始,深入研究布雷迪的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BRC Ownership Breakdown March 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BRC 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Brady?

關於布雷迪,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Brady. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Brady's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者在布雷迪擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到布雷迪的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BRC Earnings and Revenue Growth March 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BRC收益和收入增長 2024年3月9日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Brady. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 11% of shares outstanding. With 10% and 9.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Elizabeth Bruno are the second and third largest shareholders. Elizabeth Bruno, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。對沖基金在布雷迪的股票不多。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其已發行股份爲11%。貝萊德公司和伊麗莎白·布魯諾分別擁有10%和9.3%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。第三大股東伊麗莎白·布魯諾也恰好擁有董事會成員的頭銜。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前十名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Brady

布雷迪的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Brady Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$272m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有布雷迪公司的部分股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值2.72億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Brady. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有13%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對布雷迪有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Brady better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解布雷迪,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的交互式圖表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論