share_log

After the Recent Decline, Logan Group Company Limited (HKG:3380) Top Key Executive Hoi Pang Kei's Holdings Have Lost 14% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Logan Group Company Limited (HKG:3380) Top Key Executive Hoi Pang Kei's Holdings Have Lost 14% of Their Value

在最近的下跌之後,龍光集團有限公司(HKG: 3380)高管海鵬基的控股已經損失了14%的價值
Simply Wall St ·  03/07 18:56

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Logan Group implies vested interests in company growth
  • Hoi Pang Kei owns 62% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 對洛根集團的重大內部控制意味着公司增長的既得利益
  • Hoi Pang Kei 擁有該公司 62% 的股份
  • 使用公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

If you want to know who really controls Logan Group Company Limited (HKG:3380), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 77% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着龍光集團有限公司(HKG: 3380),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有77%所有權的個人內部人士。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by HK$497m.

結果,在市值下降4.97億港元之後,內部人士整體遭受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Logan Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於洛根集團的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:3380 Ownership Breakdown March 7th 2024
SEHK: 3380 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 7 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Logan Group?

關於洛根集團,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活躍的小公司通常缺少機構投資者,但是沒有機構投資者的大公司並不常見。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Logan Group, for yourself, below.

沒有機構擁有公司股份的原因可能多種多樣。通常,小型的新上市公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理不可能在公司中建立有意義的地位。基金經理也可能不擁有這隻股票,因爲他們不相信股票會表現良好。機構投資者可能不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能還有其他因素在起作用。你可以在下面親眼看到洛根集團過去的收入表現。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:3380 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 7th 2024
SEHK: 3380 2024 年 3 月 7 日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Logan Group. Our data suggests that Hoi Pang Kei, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 62%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 15% and 0.08%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對洛根集團進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,同時也是該公司最高主要高管的Hoi Pang Kei持有的股票數量最多,爲62%。當內部人士持有公司大量股票時,投資者認爲這是一個積極的信號,因爲這表明內部人士願意將自己的財富綁定在公司的未來中。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的15%和0.08%。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Logan Group

洛根集團的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Logan Group Company Limited. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of HK$3.3b, that means they have HK$2.5b worth of shares. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有洛根集團有限公司一半以上的股份。這使他們能夠有效控制公司。鑑於其市值爲33億港元,這意味着他們擁有價值25億港元的股票。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司23%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。儘管這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Logan Group you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。一個很好的例子:我們已經發現了洛根集團的兩個警告信號,你應該注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論