share_log

R&G PharmaStudies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301333) Market Cap Dropped CN¥422m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 51% Were Hit as Were Institutions

R&G PharmaStudies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301333) Market Cap Dropped CN¥422m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 51% Were Hit as Were Institutions

R&G 製藥研究有限公司's (SZSE: 301333) 上週市值下降了4.22億元人民幣;持有51%的個人投資者和機構一樣受到打擊
Simply Wall St ·  03/07 18:31

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • R&G PharmaStudies' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 3 shareholders own 53% of the company
  • 14% of R&G PharmaStudies is held by insiders
  • R&G PharmaStudies擁有大量私營公司所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 前三名股東擁有公司53%的股份
  • R&G PharmaStudies的14%由內部人士持有

Every investor in R&G PharmaStudies Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301333) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 51% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

R&G PharmaStudies有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:301333)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。私營公司擁有51%的股份,擁有該公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

While the holdings of private companies took a hit after last week's 8.8% price drop, institutions with their 16% holdings also suffered.

儘管在上週股價下跌8.8%之後,私營公司的持股量受到打擊,但持有16%的機構也遭受了損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of R&G PharmaStudies, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究R&G PharmaStudies的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:301333 Ownership Breakdown March 7th 2024
SZSE: 301333 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 7 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About R&G PharmaStudies?

關於R&G PharmaStudies,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that R&G PharmaStudies does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at R&G PharmaStudies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,R&G PharmaStudies確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看R&G PharmaStudies的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:301333 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 7th 2024
SZSE: 301333 2024 年 3 月 7 日收益和收入增長

R&G PharmaStudies is not owned by hedge funds. Ace Union Holding Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 29% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 12% of the shares outstanding respectively, Hongbei Zheng and Shihezi Kangyunfu Equity Investment Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

R&G PharmaStudies不歸對沖基金所有。Ace Union Holding Limited目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲29%。鄭宏北和石河子康雲富股權投資有限公司分別持有12%和12%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前三名股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有一些分析師對這隻股票的報道,但隨着時間的推移,它仍可能變得更加廣爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of R&G PharmaStudies

R&G PharmaStudies 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of R&G PharmaStudies Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥595m stake in this CN¥4.4b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

內部人士似乎擁有R&G PharmaStudies有限公司的很大一部分股份。內部人士在這項44億元的業務中持有5.95億元人民幣的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司10%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 7.2% stake in R&G PharmaStudies. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有R&G PharmaStudies7.2%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 51%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的51%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand R&G PharmaStudies better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解R&G PharmaStudies,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論