share_log

Institutional Investors May Overlook AxoGen, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AXGN) Recent US$72m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

Institutional Investors May Overlook AxoGen, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AXGN) Recent US$72m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

機構投資者可能會忽略AxoGen, Inc.”s(納斯達克股票代碼:AXGN)由於長期收益保持樂觀,最近市值下降了7200萬美元
Simply Wall St ·  03/06 06:26

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies AxoGen's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 高機構所有權意味着AxoGen的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前十名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

If you want to know who really controls AxoGen, Inc. (NASDAQ:AXGN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着AxoGEN, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:AXGN),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲59%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$456m last week. However, the 11% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上週該公司的市值跌至4.56億美元后,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。但是,11%的股東一年回報率可能減輕了打擊。但是,他們應該注意將來的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of AxoGen.

在下圖中,我們放大了AxoGen的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:AXGN Ownership Breakdown March 6th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:AXGN 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AxoGen?

關於AxoGen,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AxoGen. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of AxoGen, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者在AxoGen中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下AxoGen過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:AXGN Earnings and Revenue Growth March 6th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:AXGN 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 6 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It looks like hedge funds own 18% of AxoGen shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is ArrowMark Colorado Holdings, LLC with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.8% and 6.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Karen Zaderej is the owner of 2.5% of the company's shares.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。看來對沖基金擁有AxOgen18%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是ArrowMark Colorado Holdings, LLC,其已發行股份爲12%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的7.8%和6.6%。此外,首席執行官凱倫·扎德雷伊是該公司2.5%股份的所有者。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現10位大股東約佔登記冊的50%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of AxoGen

AxoGen的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can see that insiders own shares in AxoGen, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$22m worth of the US$456m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有AxoGen, Inc.的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值4.56億美元的公司價值2200萬美元。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司18%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for AxoGen you should know about.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了兩個你應該知道的AxoGen警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論