share_log

Hla Group Corp., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600398) Market Cap up CN¥3.0b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 47% as Well as Insiders

Hla Group Corp., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600398) Market Cap up CN¥3.0b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 47% as Well as Insiders

Hla 集團有限公司s(SHSE: 600398)上週市值上漲了30億元人民幣,這使持有47%的私營公司和內部人士都受益
Simply Wall St ·  03/04 22:21

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Hla Group by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 66% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Insiders own 26% of Hla Group
  • 私營公司對Hla集團的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 66% 的業務由前兩名股東持有
  • 內部人士擁有Hla集團26%的股份

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Hla Group Corp., Ltd. (SHSE:600398), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了Hla集團有限公司(SHSE: 600398),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,私營公司擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲47%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Private companies gained the most after market cap touched CN¥38b last week, while insiders who own 26% also benefitted.

上週市值觸及380億元人民幣後,私營公司漲幅最大,而持有26%的內部人士也從中受益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hla Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Hla集團的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600398 Ownership Breakdown March 5th 2024
SHSE: 600398 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 5 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hla Group?

關於Hla集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hla Group. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hla Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者在Hla集團擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Hla Group的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600398 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 5th 2024
SHSE: 600398 2024 年 3 月 5 日收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hla Group. Heilan Group Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 40% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 25% and 3.7% of the stock.

對沖基金在Hla集團的股份不多。海瀾集團股份有限公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的40%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約25%和3.7%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Hla Group

Hla 集團的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hla Group Corp., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥9.8b stake in this CN¥38b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Hla集團有限公司合理比例的股份。有趣的是,內部人士在這項380億元的業務中擁有98億元人民幣的大量股份。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Hla Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Hla集團14%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 47%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據表明,私營公司持有公司47%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私營公司對上市公司的股票感興趣。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hla Group better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Hla Group .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Hla集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該注意我們在Hla集團發現的1個警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論