share_log

With 72% Ownership in Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 72% Ownership in Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

擁有卡特彼勒公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CAT)72%的所有權,機構投資者在很大程度上依賴該業務
Simply Wall St ·  03/03 07:50

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Caterpillar's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 24 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 高機構所有權意味着卡特彼勒的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 50% 的業務由前 24 名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

A look at the shareholders of Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 72% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看卡特彼勒公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CAT)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲72%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 4.0% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 35% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

結果,在上週公司股價上漲4.0%之後,機構投資者獲得了最大的回報。目前,一年的投資回報率爲35%,上週的收益本來會非常受歡迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Caterpillar.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於卡特彼勒的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:CAT Ownership Breakdown March 3rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:CAT 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 3 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Caterpillar?

關於卡特彼勒,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Caterpillar does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Caterpillar, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,卡特彼勒確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看卡特彼勒過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:CAT Earnings and Revenue Growth March 3rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:CAT 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 3 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Caterpillar is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.7% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.6% and 6.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。卡特彼勒不歸對沖基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲9.7%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的7.6%和6.7%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 24 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前24名股東的合併所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個單一股東擁有多數股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Caterpillar

卡特彼勒的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Caterpillar Inc. in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$312m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有卡特彼勒公司不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士擁有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值3.12億美元的股票。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Caterpillar. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有28%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對卡特彼勒有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Caterpillar that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了卡特彼勒的兩個警告信號,在投資之前,您應該注意這些信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論