share_log

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Vector Group Ltd.'s (NYSE:VGR) Recent US$68m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Vector Group Ltd.'s (NYSE:VGR) Recent US$68m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

機構所有者可以考慮像Vector集團有限公司那樣採取嚴厲措施。”s(紐約證券交易所代碼:VGR)最近的6800萬美元下跌增加了長期損失
Simply Wall St ·  03/02 08:25

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Vector Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Vector Group的股價可能會受到其交易決策的影響
  • 共有7名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

A look at the shareholders of Vector Group Ltd. (NYSE:VGR) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 65% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看矢量集團有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:VGR)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。機構擁有65%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.8b last week after a 3.8% drop in the share price. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 12% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Vector Group which might hurt individual investors.

因此,上週該公司的市值在股價下跌3.8%後跌至18億美元,因此機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。最近的虧損加上股東一年的虧損12%,可能不適合這群投資者。也被稱爲 “智能貨幣”,機構對股票價格的走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果繼續下跌,機構投資者可能會被迫出售Vector Group,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Vector Group.

在下圖中,我們放大了 Vector Group 的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:VGR Ownership Breakdown March 2nd 2024
紐約證券交易所:VGR 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 2 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vector Group?

關於Vector Group,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Vector Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Vector Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在Vector Group中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Vector Group的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:VGR Earnings and Revenue Growth March 2nd 2024
紐約證券交易所:VGR 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 2 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Vector Group is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 9.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Phillip Frost are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Howard Lorber is the owner of 3.5% of the company's shares.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。矢量集團不歸對沖基金所有。貝萊德公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的14%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和Phillip Frost分別擁有11%和9.4%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,首席執行官霍華德·洛伯是該公司3.5%股份的所有者。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前7名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有一些分析師對這隻股票的報道,但隨着時間的推移,它仍可能變得更加廣爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Vector Group

矢量集團的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Vector Group Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.8b, and insiders have US$252m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Vector集團有限公司合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲18億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值2.52億美元的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會說,這表明了與股東的良好一致性,尤其是在如此規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Vector Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有矢量集團21%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Vector Group (including 2 which shouldn't be ignored) .

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該了解我們在 Vector Group 中發現的 4 個警告信號(包括 2 個不容忽視的警告)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論