share_log

Lancy (SZSE:002612) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Lancy (SZSE:002612) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Lancy (SZSE: 002612) 的資產負債表相當不錯
Simply Wall St ·  02/27 18:09

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Lancy Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002612) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

大衛·伊本說得好,他說:“波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本的永久損失。”當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡考慮其債務的用途,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。重要的是,朗西有限公司(深圳證券交易所:002612)確實有債務。但真正的問題是這筆債務是否使公司面臨風險。

When Is Debt A Problem?

債務何時會成爲問題?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

債務爲企業提供幫助,直到企業難以用新的資本或自由現金流還清債務。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能一無所有地離開。儘管這種情況不太常見,但我們經常看到負債公司永久稀釋股東,因爲貸款人迫使他們以低價籌集資金。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司合理地管理債務,而且對自己有利。考慮公司債務水平的第一步是將其現金和債務放在一起考慮。

What Is Lancy's Debt?

什麼是蘭西的債務?

As you can see below, Lancy had CN¥931.4m of debt at September 2023, down from CN¥1.21b a year prior. However, because it has a cash reserve of CN¥423.6m, its net debt is less, at about CN¥507.7m.

如下所示,截至2023年9月,蘭西的債務爲9.314億元人民幣,低於去年同期的12.1億元人民幣。但是,由於其現金儲備爲4.236億元人民幣,其淨負債較少,約爲5.077億元人民幣。

debt-equity-history-analysis
SZSE:002612 Debt to Equity History February 27th 2024
SZSE: 002612 2024 年 2 月 27 日債務與股本比率的歷史記錄

A Look At Lancy's Liabilities

看看蘭西的負債

The latest balance sheet data shows that Lancy had liabilities of CN¥2.62b due within a year, and liabilities of CN¥1.13b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had CN¥423.6m in cash and CN¥365.7m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total CN¥2.97b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,蘭西的負債爲26.2億元人民幣,此後到期的負債爲11.3億元人民幣。與此相抵消的是,它有4.236億元的現金和3.657億元人民幣的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總額高出29.7億元人民幣。

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Lancy has a market capitalization of CN¥7.90b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

儘管這可能看起來很多,但還不錯,因爲朗西的市值爲790億元人民幣,因此如果需要,它可能會通過籌集資金來加強資產負債表。但很明顯,我們一定要仔細研究它能否在不稀釋的情況下管理債務。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

爲了擴大公司相對於收益的負債規模,我們計算其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),將其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)除以利息支出(利息保障)。這種方法的優勢在於,我們既考慮了債務的絕對數量(包括淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤),也考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(及其利息覆蓋率)。

We'd say that Lancy's moderate net debt to EBITDA ratio ( being 1.8), indicates prudence when it comes to debt. And its commanding EBIT of 24.0 times its interest expense, implies the debt load is as light as a peacock feather. Notably, Lancy's EBIT launched higher than Elon Musk, gaining a whopping 145% on last year. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Lancy's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

我們可以說,蘭西的淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率適中(爲1.8),這表明在債務問題上謹慎行事。其驚人的息稅前利潤是其利息支出的24.0倍,這意味着債務負擔像孔雀羽毛一樣輕。值得注意的是,蘭西的息稅前利潤高於埃隆·馬斯克,比去年增長了145%。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,未來的收益比什麼都重要,將決定蘭西未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, Lancy actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.

但是我們最終的考慮因素也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤來償還債務;它需要冷硬現金。因此,合乎邏輯的步驟是研究息稅前利潤與實際自由現金流相匹配的比例。在過去的三年中,蘭西產生的自由現金流實際上超過了息稅前利潤。在保持貸款人的支持方面,沒有什麼比流入的現金更好的了。

Our View

我們的觀點

Lancy's interest cover suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow is also very heartening. Zooming out, Lancy seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in Lancy, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.

蘭西的利息保障表明,它可以像克里斯蒂亞諾·羅納爾多在對陣14歲以下的守門員的比賽中進球一樣輕鬆地處理債務。這僅僅是好消息的開始,因爲將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流也非常令人鼓舞。放眼望去,蘭西似乎相當合理地使用債務;這得到了我們的點頭。雖然債務確實會帶來風險,但如果明智地使用,它也可以帶來更高的股本回報率。隨着時間的推移,股價往往會跟隨每股收益,因此,如果你對蘭西感興趣,你很可能想點擊這裏查看其每股收益歷史的互動圖表。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

畢竟,如果你對一家資產負債表堅如磐石的快速成長型公司更感興趣,那麼請立即查看我們的淨現金增長股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論