share_log

Be Wary Of North Industries Group Red Arrow (SZSE:000519) And Its Returns On Capital

Be Wary Of North Industries Group Red Arrow (SZSE:000519) And Its Returns On Capital

警惕北方工業集團紅箭(深圳證券交易所代碼:000519)及其資本回報率
Simply Wall St ·  02/26 23:29

If we want to find a potential multi-bagger, often there are underlying trends that can provide clues. Ideally, a business will show two trends; firstly a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an increasing amount of capital employed. Basically this means that a company has profitable initiatives that it can continue to reinvest in, which is a trait of a compounding machine. However, after investigating North Industries Group Red Arrow (SZSE:000519), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.

如果我們想找到潛在的多袋裝袋機,通常有一些潛在的趨勢可以提供線索。理想情況下,企業將表現出兩種趨勢;首先是增長 返回 論資本使用率(ROCE),其次是增加 金額 所用資本的比例。基本上,這意味着公司擁有可以繼續進行再投資的盈利計劃,這是複合機器的特徵。但是,在調查了北方工業集團紅箭(SZSE: 000519)之後,我們認爲目前的趨勢不符合多袋機的模式。

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

資本使用回報率(ROCE):這是什麼?

For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on North Industries Group Red Arrow is:

對於那些不確定ROCE是什麼的人,它衡量的是公司從其業務中使用的資本中可以產生的稅前利潤金額。北方工業集團紅箭的計算公式爲:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)

0.0047 = CN¥49m ÷ (CN¥14b - CN¥3.8b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).

0.0047 = 4900萬元人民幣 ÷(14億元人民幣-38億元人民幣) (基於截至2023年9月的過去十二個月)

So, North Industries Group Red Arrow has an ROCE of 0.5%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Machinery industry average of 6.0%.

因此,北方工業集團紅箭的投資回報率爲0.5%。從絕對值來看,這是一個低迴報,其表現也低於機械行業6.0%的平均水平。

roce
SZSE:000519 Return on Capital Employed February 27th 2024
SZSE: 000519 2024年2月27日動用資本回報率

Above you can see how the current ROCE for North Industries Group Red Arrow compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for North Industries Group Red Arrow .

在上面你可以看到北方工業集團Red Arrow當前的投資回報率與其先前的資本回報率相比如何,但從過去可以看出來的只有那麼多。如果你想了解分析師對未來的預測,你應該查看我們爲北方工業集團Red Arrow提供的免費分析師報告。

How Are Returns Trending?

退貨趨勢如何?

In terms of North Industries Group Red Arrow's historical ROCE movements, the trend isn't fantastic. Over the last five years, returns on capital have decreased to 0.5% from 5.2% five years ago. And considering revenue has dropped while employing more capital, we'd be cautious. This could mean that the business is losing its competitive advantage or market share, because while more money is being put into ventures, it's actually producing a lower return - "less bang for their buck" per se.

就北方工業集團Red Arrow的歷史ROCE走勢而言,這一趨勢並不理想。在過去五年中,資本回報率從五年前的5.2%下降到0.5%。考慮到在僱用更多資本的同時收入有所下降,我們會謹慎行事。這可能意味着該企業正在失去其競爭優勢或市場份額,因爲儘管向風險投資投入了更多的資金,但它產生的回報實際上更低—— “成本效益更低” 本身。

The Bottom Line

底線

From the above analysis, we find it rather worrisome that returns on capital and sales for North Industries Group Red Arrow have fallen, meanwhile the business is employing more capital than it was five years ago. Yet despite these concerning fundamentals, the stock has performed strongly with a 61% return over the last five years, so investors appear very optimistic. Regardless, we don't feel too comfortable with the fundamentals so we'd be steering clear of this stock for now.

從上述分析來看,我們發現令人擔憂的是,北方工業集團紅箭的資本回報率和銷售回報率有所下降,同時該業務僱用的資本比五年前還要多。然而,儘管存在這些令人擔憂的基本面,但該股在過去五年中表現強勁,回報率爲61%,因此投資者似乎非常樂觀。無論如何,我們對基本面不太滿意,因此我們暫時會避開這隻股票。

On a final note, we've found 2 warning signs for North Industries Group Red Arrow that we think you should be aware of.

最後,我們發現了北方工業集團紅箭俠的兩個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意這些信號。

For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.

對於那些喜歡投資穩健公司的人,可以查看這份資產負債表穩健和股本回報率高的公司的免費清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論