share_log

Haichang Ocean Park Holdings Ltd.'s (HKG:2255) Most Bullish Insider, Senior Key Executive Cheng Qu Must Be Pleased With the Recent 8.6% Gain

Haichang Ocean Park Holdings Ltd.'s (HKG:2255) Most Bullish Insider, Senior Key Executive Cheng Qu Must Be Pleased With the Recent 8.6% Gain

海昌海洋公園控股有限公司s (HKG: 2255) 最看漲的內幕人士,高級主要高管曲成一定對最近8.6%的漲幅感到滿意
Simply Wall St ·  02/20 17:51

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Haichang Ocean Park Holdings' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 62% ownership
  • Institutions own 26% of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings
  • 從海昌海洋公園控股公司的龐大所有權來看,業內人士似乎對海昌海洋公園控股公司的增長有既得利益
  • 共有2名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,持有62%的所有權
  • 機構擁有海昌海洋公園控股公司26%的股份

A look at the shareholders of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings Ltd. (HKG:2255) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看海昌海洋公園控股有限公司(HKG: 2255)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,個別內部人士擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲48%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by HK$487m last week.

顯然,上週該公司的市值上漲了4.87億港元之後,內部人士受益最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings.

在下圖中,我們放大了海昌海洋公園控股公司的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2255 Ownership Breakdown February 20th 2024
SEHK: 2255 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 20 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Haichang Ocean Park Holdings?

機構所有權告訴我們關於海昌海洋公園控股的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Haichang Ocean Park Holdings. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者持有海昌海洋公園控股公司的大量股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看海昌海洋公園控股公司過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2255 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 20th 2024
SEHK: 2255 2024年2月20日收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Haichang Ocean Park Holdings. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Haichang Ocean Park Holdings' case, its Senior Key Executive, Cheng Qu, is the largest shareholder, holding 48% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 3.4% of the stock.

對沖基金在海昌海洋公園控股的股份不多。因爲行動勝於雄辯,所以我們認爲當內部人士擁有公司的大量股份時,這是一個好兆頭。就海昌海洋公園控股而言,其高級主要高管程曲是最大股東,持有48%的已發行股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約15%和3.4%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 62% stake.

對股東登記處的更詳細研究表明,兩位大股東通過其62%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings

海昌海洋公園控股的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Haichang Ocean Park Holdings Ltd.. Insiders own HK$3.0b worth of shares in the HK$6.2b company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有海昌海洋公園控股有限公司的大量股份。內部人士擁有這家62億港元公司價值30億港元的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司26%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以使政策決定對他們有利,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論