share_log

Raffles Medical Group Ltd's (SGX:BSL) Market Cap Surged S$74m Last Week, Private Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded

Raffles Medical Group Ltd's (SGX:BSL) Market Cap Surged S$74m Last Week, Private Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded

萊佛士醫療集團有限公司(新加坡證券交易所股票代碼:BSL)的市值上週飆升了7400萬新元,對公司有很大依賴的私營公司獲得了獎勵
Simply Wall St ·  02/20 17:36

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Raffles Medical Group by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 3 shareholders own 59% of the company
  • Insider ownership in Raffles Medical Group is 13%
  • 私營公司對萊佛士醫療集團的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 前三名股東擁有公司59%的股份
  • 萊佛士醫療集團的內部所有權爲13%

Every investor in Raffles Medical Group Ltd (SGX:BSL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 42% to be precise, is private companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

萊佛士醫療集團有限公司(新加坡證券交易所股票代碼:BSL)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是私營公司,準確地說約爲42%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 4.0% gain.

結果,私營公司是上週4.0%漲幅的最大受益者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Raffles Medical Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於萊佛士醫療集團的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:BSL Ownership Breakdown February 20th 2024
新加坡證券交易所:BSL 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 20 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Raffles Medical Group?

關於萊佛士醫療集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Raffles Medical Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Raffles Medical Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者持有萊佛士醫療集團的大量股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下萊佛士醫療集團過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:BSL Earnings and Revenue Growth February 20th 2024
新加坡證券交易所:BSL 收益和收入增長 2024 年 2 月 20 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Raffles Medical Group. Raffles Medical Holdings Pte. Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 39% of shares outstanding. Choon Yong Loo is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Global Alpha Capital Management Ltd. holds about 9.1% of the company stock. Choon Yong Loo, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

對沖基金在萊佛士醫療集團的股份不多。萊佛士醫療控股有限公司Ltd. 目前是最大股東,已發行股份的39%。Choon Yong Loo是第二大股東,擁有11%的普通股,環球阿爾法資本管理有限公司持有該公司約9.1%的股份。第二大股東Choon Yong Loo也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 59% stake.

對股東登記處的更詳細的研究表明,3位大股東通過其59%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Raffles Medical Group

萊佛士醫療集團的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Raffles Medical Group Ltd. It has a market capitalization of just S$1.9b, and insiders have S$249m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

內部人士似乎擁有萊佛士醫療集團有限公司的很大一部分股份。該公司的市值僅爲19億新元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值2.49億新元的股票。這非常重要。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 29% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Raffles Medical Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有29%所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對萊佛士醫療集團有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 42%, of the Raffles Medical Group stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

私人公司似乎擁有萊佛士醫療集團42%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Raffles Medical Group (including 1 which is a bit concerning) .

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲此,你應該了解我們在萊佛士醫療集團發現的兩個警告信號(包括一個有點令人擔憂的警告)。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論