share_log

Procaps Group S.A.'s (NASDAQ:PROC) Top Key Executive Ruben Minski Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 14% Last Week

Procaps Group S.A.'s (NASDAQ:PROC) Top Key Executive Ruben Minski Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 14% Last Week

Procaps Group S.A. 's(納斯達克股票代碼:PROC)高管魯本·明斯基是最樂觀的內部人士,他們的持股量上週增長了14%
Simply Wall St ·  02/17 08:37

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Procaps Group implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 60% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 對Procaps Group的重大內部控制意味着公司增長具有既得利益
  • 共有3名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,擁有60%的所有權
  • 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會

Every investor in Procaps Group S.A. (NASDAQ:PROC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 60% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Procaps Group S.A.(納斯達克股票代碼:PROC)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有60%所有權的個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$403m market cap following a 14% gain in the stock.

結果,內部人士上週得分最高,該公司的市值在股價上漲14%後達到4.03億美元。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Procaps Group, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下表開始,更深入地研究Procaps Group的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:PROC Ownership Breakdown February 17th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車:PROC 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 17 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Procaps Group?

關於Procaps Group,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活躍的小公司通常缺少機構投資者,但是沒有機構投資者的大公司並不常見。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Procaps Group might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

機構爲何不擁有股票,有多種解釋。最常見的情況是,公司相對於所管理的資金來說規模太小,因此該機構不願仔細研究該公司。基金經理也可能不擁有這隻股票,因爲他們不相信股票會表現良好。Procaps Group可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的業績,或者他們可能只是沒有仔細研究該業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:PROC Earnings and Revenue Growth February 17th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:PROC收益和收入增長 2024年2月17日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Procaps Group. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Ruben Minski (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 28% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. The second and third largest shareholders are Jose Gontovnik and Deseja Trust, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 16%.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Procaps集團進行有意義的投資。根據我們的數據,我們推斷出最大股東是魯本·明斯基(他還擁有最高關鍵高管的頭銜),已發行股份的28%。當內部人士擁有公司大量股份時,這通常被認爲是一個好兆頭,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到公司內部人士扮演關鍵利益相關者的角色。第二和第三大股東是何塞·貢托夫尼克和德塞亞信託基金,持有與他們同等數量的股份,爲16%。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 60% stake.

對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,3名最大股東通過其60%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Procaps Group

Procaps 集團的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Procaps Group S.A.. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a US$240m stake in this US$403m business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有Procaps Group S.A. 一半以上的股份。這使他們能夠有效控制公司。因此,他們在這筆4.03億美元的業務中擁有2.4億美元的股份。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示出與股東的強烈一致性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Procaps Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Procaps集團16%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 7.5% stake in Procaps Group. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有Procaps集團7.5%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 16%, of the Procaps Group stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

私人公司似乎擁有Procaps集團16%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Procaps Group better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Procaps Group (including 2 which shouldn't be ignored) .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Procaps集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該了解我們在Procaps集團發現的4個警告信號(包括2個不容忽視的警告信號)。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論