share_log

Jiangsu Lopal Tech. Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603906) 17% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Individual Investors Who Own 46% as Well as Insiders

Jiangsu Lopal Tech. Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603906) 17% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Individual Investors Who Own 46% as Well as Insiders

江蘇龍寶科技有限公司。's (SHSE: 603906) 上週漲幅17%,使持有46%的個人投資者和內部人士受益
Simply Wall St ·  02/12 21:02

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Jiangsu Lopal Tech indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • 42% of Jiangsu Lopal Tech is held by insiders
  • 個人投資者在江蘇龍寶科技擁有大量所有權,這表明他們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 江蘇龍寶科技42%的股份由內部人士持有

A look at the shareholders of Jiangsu Lopal Tech. Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603906) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 46% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看江蘇龍寶科技的股東。有限公司(上海證券交易所代碼:603906)可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲46%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 17% price gain, insiders also received a 42% cut.

儘管在上週股價上漲17%之後,個人投資者是獲得最大收益的群體,但內部人士也獲得了42%的下調。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Jiangsu Lopal Tech, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究江蘇龍寶科技的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603906 Ownership Breakdown February 13th 2024
SHSE: 603906 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jiangsu Lopal Tech?

關於江蘇龍寶科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Jiangsu Lopal Tech already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Jiangsu Lopal Tech, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

江蘇龍寶科技已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看江蘇龍寶科技過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603906 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 13th 2024
SHSE: 603906 收益和收入增長 2024 年 2 月 13 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Jiangsu Lopal Tech. The company's largest shareholder is Jun Feng Shi, with ownership of 38%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 4.2% and 1.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對江蘇龍寶科技進行有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是石俊峯,所有權爲38%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的4.2%和1.6%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前十名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Jiangsu Lopal Tech

江蘇龍寶科技的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Jiangsu Lopal Tech. Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥2.1b stake in this CN¥4.9b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有江蘇龍寶科技合理比例的股份。有限公司。。業內人士在這項49億元的業務中持有21億元人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 46% stake in Jiangsu Lopal Tech. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有江蘇龍寶科技46%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Jiangsu Lopal Tech that you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了江蘇龍寶科技的1個警告標誌,你應該注意這一點。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,來看看這份有趣的公司的免費清單吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論