share_log

With 7.1% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Universal Corporation's (NYSE:UVV) 10% Stock Price Decline

With 7.1% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Universal Corporation's (NYSE:UVV) 10% Stock Price Decline

憑藉7.1%的一年期回報率,機構所有者可能會忽略環球公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:UVV)10%的股價下跌
Simply Wall St ·  02/09 08:52

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Universal implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 6 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構在環球影業的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 前6名股東擁有公司51%的股份
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

If you want to know who really controls Universal Corporation (NYSE:UVV), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了環球公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:UVV),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。機構擁有83%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$152m last week. However, the 7.1% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上週該公司的市值下降了1.52億美元后,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。但是,7.1%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但是,他們應該注意未來的進一步損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Universal, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究環球影業的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:UVV Ownership Breakdown February 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:UVV 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Universal?

關於環球影業,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Universal. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Universal, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者在環球影業擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看環球影業過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:UVV Earnings and Revenue Growth February 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:UVV收益和收入增長 2024年2月9日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Universal. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 16%. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP holds about 7.7% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO George Freeman is the owner of 0.7% of the company's shares.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。對沖基金在環球影業的股票不多。該公司的最大股東是貝萊德公司,所有權爲16%。Vanguard Group, Inc.是第二大股東,擁有12%的普通股,Dimensional Fund Advisors LP持有該公司約7.7%的股份。此外,首席執行官喬治·弗里曼持有該公司0.7%的股份。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前六名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Universal

環球影業的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Universal Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$24m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有環球公司的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值2400萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司15%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Universal you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。一個很好的例子:我們已經發現了你應該注意的3個環球警告信號,其中一個可能很嚴重。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論