share_log

Cinda Real Estate Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600657) Latest 14% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

Cinda Real Estate Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600657) Latest 14% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

信達地產有限公司s(SHSE: 600657)最近14%的跌幅增加了一年的虧損,機構投資者可能會考慮採取嚴厲措施
Simply Wall St ·  02/06 17:50

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Cinda Real Estate implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The largest shareholder of the company is CINDA INVESTMENT Co.,LTD with a 54% stake
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構持有信達地產的大量股權意味着它們對公司的股價有重大影響
  • 該公司的最大股東是信達投資有限公司。, LTD 持有 54% 的股份
  • 使用公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Cinda Real Estate Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600657), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 58% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了信達地產有限公司(SHSE: 600657),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有58%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥1.5b. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 42% for shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. Hence, if weakness in Cinda Real Estate's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

結果,在市值下跌15億元人民幣之後,機構投資者上週遭受了最大的損失。這組投資者可能特別擔心當前的虧損,這加劇了股東一年的虧損42%。機構或 “流動性提供者” 控制着大量資金,因此,這些類型的投資者通常對股價走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果信達地產股價持續疲軟,機構投資者可能會感到不得不出售該股票,這對於個人投資者來說可能並不理想。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Cinda Real Estate.

在下圖中,我們放大了信達房地產的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600657 Ownership Breakdown February 6th 2024
SHSE: 600657 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cinda Real Estate?

關於信達地產,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Cinda Real Estate does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cinda Real Estate, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,信達房地產確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看信達房地產過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600657 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 6th 2024
SHSE: 600657 收益和收入增長 2024 年 2 月 6 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Cinda Real Estate. The company's largest shareholder is CINDA INVESTMENT Co.,LTD, with ownership of 54%. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. Huaihe Energy Holding Group Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 19% of common stock, and Jiangxi Ganyue Expressway CO.,LTD. holds about 3.2% of the company stock.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。對沖基金在信達房地產的股份不多。該公司的最大股東是信達投資有限公司。,LTD,所有權爲54%。由於所有權持有如此巨額的股份,我們推斷他們對公司的未來擁有重大控制權。淮河能源控股集團有限公司是第二大股東,擁有19%的普通股,江西贛悅高速公路有限公司。, LTD. 持有公司約3.2%的股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Cinda Real Estate

信達房地產的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我們的數據無法證實董事會成員親自持有股份。董事會成員不持有至少部分個人持股的情況很少見,因此我們的數據可能存在缺陷。一個不錯的下一步是檢查首席執行官的薪水是多少。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cinda Real Estate. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

信達房地產擁有20%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對信達房地產有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 19%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的19%。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而不是以個人身份對上市公司感興趣。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 3.2% of the Cinda Real Estate shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

我們可以看到,上市公司持有信達房地產發行股票的3.2%。這可能是戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。可能是他們已經消失了。這一裁定可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Cinda Real Estate (of which 2 are significant!) you should know about.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現了信達房地產的3個警告信號(其中2個很重要!)你應該知道。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論