share_log

Private Companies Are Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603931) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥431m

Private Companies Are Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603931) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥431m

私營公司是杭州格林達電子材料有限公司s (SHSE: 603931) 最大的所有者在市值下降4.31億元人民幣後受到打擊
Simply Wall St ·  02/04 20:11

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 63% ownership
  • Institutions own 11% of Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials
  • 杭州格林達電子材料的私營公司擁有大量所有權,這表明他們在管理和業務戰略方面擁有更大的發言權
  • 共有2名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲63%
  • 機構擁有杭州格林達電子材料11%的股份

Every investor in Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603931) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

杭州格林達電子材料有限公司(SHSE: 603931)的每位投資者都應了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,私營公司擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲51%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As market cap fell to CN¥3.8b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

隨着上週市值跌至38億元人民幣,私營公司面臨的損失將超過該公司任何其他股東群體。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究杭州格林達電子材料的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603931 Ownership Breakdown February 5th 2024
SHSE: 603931 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 5 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials?

關於杭州格林達電子材料,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者持有杭州格林達電子材料的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到杭州格林達電子材料的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603931 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 5th 2024
SHSE: 603931 收益和收入增長 2024 年 2 月 5 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials. Hangzhou Electrochemical Group Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 42% of shares outstanding. With 21% and 5.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, Ningbo Qingcheng Investment Management Partnership Enterprise (LP) and Hangzhou Lusheng Investment Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對杭州格林達電子材料進行有意義的投資。杭州電化集團有限公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的42%。寧波青城投資管理合夥企業(LP)和杭州綠盛投資合夥企業(有限合夥)分別佔已發行股份的21%和5.4%,是第二和第三大股東。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials

杭州格林達電子材料的內幕所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials Co., Ltd.. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥3.8b, and the board has only CN¥14m worth of shares in their own names. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有的杭州格林達電子材料有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,我們確實注意到,內部人士有可能通過私營公司或其他公司結構獲得間接利益。它的市值僅爲38億元人民幣,董事會以自己的名義持有價值1400萬元人民幣的股票。許多人傾向於看到一個擁有更多股權的董事會。一個不錯的下一步可能是看看這份免費的內幕買入和賣出摘要。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

杭州格林達電子材料擁有17%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆,在一定程度上對杭州格林達電子材料有影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 21%, private equity firms could influence the Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有21%的股份,可能會影響杭州格林達電子材料董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 51%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司51%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司感興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。一個很好的例子:我們已經發現了一個你應該注意的杭州格林達電子材料的警告標誌。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,來看看這份有趣的公司的免費清單吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論