share_log

The Five-year Underlying Earnings Growth at First Bancshares (NASDAQ:FBMS) Is Promising, but the Shareholders Are Still in the Red Over That Time

The Five-year Underlying Earnings Growth at First Bancshares (NASDAQ:FBMS) Is Promising, but the Shareholders Are Still in the Red Over That Time

First Bancshares(納斯達克股票代碼:FBMS)的五年基礎收益增長令人鼓舞,但在此期間,股東仍處於虧損狀態
Simply Wall St ·  02/01 07:32

For many, the main point of investing is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But in any portfolio, there will be mixed results between individual stocks. At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in The First Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBMS), since the last five years saw the share price fall 22%. Unfortunately the share price momentum is still quite negative, with prices down 13% in thirty days. Importantly, this could be a market reaction to the recently released financial results. You can check out the latest numbers in our company report.

對於許多人來說,投資的要點是產生比整個市場更高的回報。但是在任何投資組合中,個股之間的結果都會好壞參半。目前,一些股東可能會質疑他們對第一銀行股份公司(納斯達克股票代碼:FBMS)的投資,因爲在過去五年中,股價下跌了22%。不幸的是,股價勢頭仍然相當不利,股價在三十天內下跌了13%。重要的是,這可能是市場對最近公佈的財務業績的反應。你可以在我們的公司報告中查看最新的數字。

After losing 9.6% this past week, it's worth investigating the company's fundamentals to see what we can infer from past performance.

在上週下跌9.6%之後,值得研究該公司的基本面,看看我們可以從過去的表現中推斷出什麼。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多茲維爾的超級投資者 禾倫·巴菲特描述了股價如何並不總是合理地反映企業的價值。考慮市場對公司的看法發生了怎樣的變化的一種不完美但簡單的方法是將每股收益(EPS)的變化與股價走勢進行比較。

While the share price declined over five years, First Bancshares actually managed to increase EPS by an average of 8.0% per year. So it doesn't seem like EPS is a great guide to understanding how the market is valuing the stock. Or possibly, the market was previously very optimistic, so the stock has disappointed, despite improving EPS.

儘管股價在五年內下跌,但First Bancshares實際上設法下跌了 增加 每股收益平均每年增長8.0%。因此,每股收益似乎不是了解市場如何估值股票的好指南。或者,市場此前可能非常樂觀,因此儘管每股收益有所改善,但該股還是令人失望。

It's strange to see such muted share price performance despite sustained growth. Perhaps a clue lies in other metrics.

儘管持續增長,但看到股價表現如此低迷真是太奇怪了。也許線索在於其他指標。

In contrast to the share price, revenue has actually increased by 17% a year in the five year period. So it seems one might have to take closer look at the fundamentals to understand why the share price languishes. After all, there may be an opportunity.

與股價形成鮮明對比的是,在五年期間,收入實際上每年增長17%。因此,看來人們可能必須仔細研究基本面才能理解股價下跌的原因。畢竟,可能有機會。

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下圖描述了收入和收入隨時間推移而發生的變化(點擊圖片即可顯示確切的數值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:FBMS Earnings and Revenue Growth February 1st 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:FBMS收益和收入增長 2024年2月1日

Take a more thorough look at First Bancshares' financial health with this free report on its balance sheet.

通過這份免費的資產負債表報告,更全面地了解First Bancshares的財務狀況。

What About Dividends?

分紅呢?

As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. As it happens, First Bancshares' TSR for the last 5 years was -14%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

除了衡量股價回報率外,投資者還應考慮股東總回報率(TSR)。基於股息再投資的假設,股東總回報率納入了任何分拆或貼現資本籌集的價值以及任何股息。可以說,股東總回報率更全面地描述了股票產生的回報。碰巧的是,First Bancshares在過去5年的股東總回報率爲-14%,超過了前面提到的股價回報率。而且,猜測股息支付在很大程度上解釋了這種分歧是沒有好處的!

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

Investors in First Bancshares had a tough year, with a total loss of 15% (including dividends), against a market gain of about 17%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 3% over the last half decade. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for First Bancshares you should know about.

First Bancshares的投資者經歷了艱難的一年,總虧損了15%(包括股息),而市場漲幅約爲17%。即使是優質股票的股價有時也會下跌,但我們希望在過於感興趣之前看到企業基本指標的改善。不幸的是,去年的表現可能預示着尚未解決的挑戰,因爲它比過去五年中3%的年化虧損還要糟糕。總的來說,長期股價疲軟可能是一個壞兆頭,儘管逆勢投資者可能希望研究該股以期出現轉機。儘管市場狀況可能對股價產生的不同影響值得考慮,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了你應該知道的First Bancshares的1個警告信號。

If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: insiders have been buying them).

如果你想與管理層一起購買股票,那麼你可能會喜歡這份免費的公司名單。(提示:業內人士一直在購買它們)。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論