share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Harbour Centre Development Limited's (HKG:51) Recent 13% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Harbour Centre Development Limited's (HKG:51) Recent 13% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

由於海港中心發展有限公司(HKG: 51)最近下跌13%增加了一年的虧損,機構所有者可能會採取重大行動
Simply Wall St ·  01/26 18:09

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Harbour Centre Development's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The Wharf (Holdings) Limited owns 72% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,海港中心開發公司的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 九龍倉集團(控股)有限公司擁有該公司 72% 的股份
  • 使用公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Harbour Centre Development Limited (HKG:51), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 72% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了海港中心發展有限公司(HKG: 51),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有72%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 13% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 17% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Harbour Centre Development, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

在上週公司股價下跌13%之後,機構投資者遭受的損失最大。毋庸置疑,最近的虧損進一步加劇了股東一年的17%虧損,下降幅度可能不大,尤其是對於這類股東而言。機構或 “流動性提供者” 控制着大量資金,因此,這些類型的投資者通常對股價走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果下跌趨勢持續下去,機構可能會面臨出售海港中心開發項目的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者產生負面影響。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Harbour Centre Development.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關海港中心發展的哪些信息。

View our latest analysis for Harbour Centre Development

查看我們對海港中心發展的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:51 Ownership Breakdown January 26th 2024
SEHK: 51 所有權明細 2024 年 1 月 26 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Harbour Centre Development?

關於海港中心的發展,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Harbour Centre Development does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Harbour Centre Development, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,海港中心開發公司確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看海港中心發展過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:51 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 26th 2024
SEHK: 51 2024 年 1 月 26 日的收益和收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Harbour Centre Development is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Wharf (Holdings) Limited is the largest shareholder with 72% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. With 8.0% and 0.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Harson Investment Limited and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。海港中心開發項目不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,九龍倉集團(控股)有限公司是最大股東,已發行股份的72%。這意味着他們對公司的未來擁有多數權益控制權。哈森投資有限公司和Dimension Fund Advisors LP分別擁有8.0%和0.5%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Harbour Centre Development

海港中心開發項目的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Harbour Centre Development Limited. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It appears that the board holds about HK$55k worth of stock. This compares to a market capitalization of HK$4.3b. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有海港中心發展有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,他們可能會通過我們尚未採用的公司結構獲得間接利益。看來董事會持有價值約5.5萬港元的股票。相比之下,市值爲43億港元。我們通常希望看到董事會投入更多資金。但是,可能值得檢查這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Harbour Centre Development. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有海港中心開發項目20%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 8.0%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有公司8.0%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Harbour Centre Development you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。一個很好的例子:我們發現了一個你應該注意的海港中心開發警告標誌。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,來看看這份免費的有趣公司名單吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論