share_log

HUNAN RESUN Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:001218) Last Week's 13% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

HUNAN RESUN Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:001218) Last Week's 13% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

湖南瑞生股份有限公司's(SZSE:001218)上週13%的跌幅一定讓持有大量股份的散戶投資者感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  01/23 17:17

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • HUNAN RESUN's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 25 shareholders own 49% of the company
  • Insider ownership in HUNAN RESUN is 45%
  • 湖南瑞生擁有大量散戶投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 前 25 名股東擁有公司 49% 的股份
  • 湖南瑞森的內部所有權爲45%

If you want to know who really controls HUNAN RESUN Co., Ltd. (SZSE:001218), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 50% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了湖南瑞生股份有限公司(SZSE:001218),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,散戶投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲50%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 13% price drop, insiders with their 45% also suffered.

儘管在上週股價下跌13%之後,散戶投資者的持股量受到打擊,但業內人士的45%也遭受了損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about HUNAN RESUN.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於湖南瑞盛的什麼。

View our latest analysis for HUNAN RESUN

查看我們對湖南瑞生的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:001218 Ownership Breakdown January 23rd 2024
SZSE: 001218 所有權明細 2024 年 1 月 23 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HUNAN RESUN?

關於湖南瑞生,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Since institutions own only a small portion of HUNAN RESUN, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.

由於機構僅擁有湖南RESUN的一小部分股份,因此許多機構可能沒有花太多時間考慮這隻股票。但很明顯,有些人有;他們很喜歡它,足以買進。因此,如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移而有所改善,那麼將來我們很可能會看到更多的機構買家。如果多個機構投資者試圖同時買入股票,股價大幅上漲的情況並不少見。因此,請查看下面的歷史收益軌跡,但請記住,最重要的是未來。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:001218 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 23rd 2024
SZSE: 001218 收益和收入增長 2024 年 1 月 23 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in HUNAN RESUN. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Qizheng Jia with 17% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Bingyang Hou and Jianxiong Sun, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 4.5%.

對沖基金在湖南瑞生的股份不多。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是賈啓正,已發行股份的17%。第二和第三大股東是侯冰陽和孫劍雄,持有與他們同等數量的股份,爲4.5%。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着該公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有一些分析師對這隻股票的報道,但隨着時間的推移,它仍可能變得更加廣爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of HUNAN RESUN

湖南瑞森的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of HUNAN RESUN Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥2.5b, and insiders have CN¥1.1b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

看來內部人士擁有湖南瑞生有限公司的很大一部分股份。它的市值僅爲25億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值11億元人民幣的股票。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 50% of HUNAN RESUN shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

公衆主要由個人投資者組成,共持有湖南瑞生50%的股份。這種所有權水平賦予了廣大公衆的投資者一定的權力,可以影響董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付率等關鍵政策決策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand HUNAN RESUN better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for HUNAN RESUN you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解湖南RESUN,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。一個很好的例子:我們已經發現了你應該注意的3種湖南RESUN警告信號,其中一個有點不愉快。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論