share_log

Insiders the Biggest Winners as Silence Therapeutics Plc's (NASDAQ:SLN) Market Cap Rises to US$736m

Insiders the Biggest Winners as Silence Therapeutics Plc's (NASDAQ:SLN) Market Cap Rises to US$736m

隨着Silence Therapeutics Plc(納斯達克股票代碼:SLN)的市值升至7.36億美元,業內人士成爲最大的贏家
Simply Wall St ·  01/19 05:47

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Silence Therapeutics implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
  • Institutions own 24% of Silence Therapeutics
  • 對Silence Therapeutics的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
  • 共有4位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲53%
  • 機構擁有Silence Therapeutics24%的股份

If you want to know who really controls Silence Therapeutics plc (NASDAQ:SLN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 34% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Silence Therapeutics plc(納斯達克股票代碼:SLN),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。個人內部人士擁有34%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$736m market cap following a 7.5% gain in the stock.

結果,內部人士上週得分最高,該公司的市值在股價上漲7.5%後達到7.36億美元。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Silence Therapeutics, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Silence Therapeutics的每種所有者。

Check out our latest analysis for Silence Therapeutics

查看我們對 Silence Therapeutics 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:SLN Ownership Breakdown January 19th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:SLN 所有權明細 2024 年 1 月 19 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Silence Therapeutics?

關於沉默療法,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Silence Therapeutics. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Silence Therapeutics' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者持有Silence Therapeutics的大量股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Silence Therapeutics的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:SLN Earnings and Revenue Growth January 19th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:SLN 收益和收入增長 2024 年 1 月 19 日

It would appear that 10% of Silence Therapeutics shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Our data shows that Richard Griffiths is the largest shareholder with 23% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Robert Keith and Lombard Odier Asset Management (USA) Corp, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 11%.

看來Silence Therapeutics的10%的股票由對沖基金控制。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。我們的數據顯示,理查德·格里菲思是最大股東,已發行股票的23%。第二和第三大股東是羅伯特·基思和隆巴德·奧迪爾資產管理(美國)公司,持有與他們同等數量的股份,爲11%。

On looking further, we found that 53% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察,我們發現前四名股東持有53%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中擁有有意義的發言權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Silence Therapeutics

沉默療法的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Silence Therapeutics plc. Insiders have a US$251m stake in this US$736m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Silence Therapeutics plc的大量股份。業內人士在這筆7.36億美元的業務中持有2.51億美元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司14%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 17%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司擁有17%的所有權,能夠在制定以價值創造爲重點的企業戰略方面發揮作用。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是要求管理層負責的活動家。但是其他時候,私募股權在將公司上市後卻被搶購一空。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Silence Therapeutics better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Silence Therapeutics (including 1 which is potentially serious) .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Silence Therapeutics,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該了解我們在Silence Therapeutics中發現的4種警告信號(包括一個可能嚴重的警告信號)。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論