share_log

Investors Could Be Concerned With AviChina Industry & Technology's (HKG:2357) Returns On Capital

Investors Could Be Concerned With AviChina Industry & Technology's (HKG:2357) Returns On Capital

投資者可能會擔心中航工業與科技(HKG: 2357)的資本回報率
Simply Wall St ·  01/11 18:25

To find a multi-bagger stock, what are the underlying trends we should look for in a business? Firstly, we'll want to see a proven return on capital employed (ROCE) that is increasing, and secondly, an expanding base of capital employed. Basically this means that a company has profitable initiatives that it can continue to reinvest in, which is a trait of a compounding machine. However, after investigating AviChina Industry & Technology (HKG:2357), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.

要找到一隻多袋裝箱的股票,我們應該在企業中尋找哪些潛在趨勢?首先,我們希望看到經過驗證的 返回 關於正在增加的資本使用率(ROCE),其次是擴大 基礎 所用資本的比例。基本上,這意味着公司擁有可以繼續進行再投資的盈利計劃,這是複合機器的特徵。但是,在調查了中航工業與科技(HKG: 2357)之後,我們認爲目前的趨勢不符合多袋機的模式。

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

什麼是資本使用回報率(ROCE)?

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. To calculate this metric for AviChina Industry & Technology, this is the formula:

對於那些不知道的人來說,ROCE是衡量公司年度稅前利潤(其回報率)的指標,相對於該業務使用的資本。要計算中航工業與科技的這一指標,公式如下:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)

0.054 = CN¥5.0b ÷ (CN¥178b - CN¥84b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2023).

0.054 = 5.0億元人民幣 ÷(178億元人民幣-84億元人民幣) (基於截至 2023 年 6 月的過去十二個月)

Thus, AviChina Industry & Technology has an ROCE of 5.4%. In absolute terms, that's a low return but it's around the Aerospace & Defense industry average of 6.3%.

因此,中航工業與科技的投資回報率爲5.4%。從絕對值來看,回報率很低,但約爲航空航天和國防行業的平均水平6.3%。

Check out our latest analysis for AviChina Industry & Technology

查看我們對中航工業與科技的最新分析

roce
SEHK:2357 Return on Capital Employed January 11th 2024
SEHK: 2357 2024 年 1 月 11 日動用資本回報率

In the above chart we have measured AviChina Industry & Technology's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

在上圖中,我們將中航工業與科技先前的投資回報率與之前的表現進行了對比,但可以說,未來更爲重要。如果您有興趣,可以在我們關於公司分析師預測的免費報告中查看分析師的預測。

What Can We Tell From AviChina Industry & Technology's ROCE Trend?

我們可以從中航工業與科技的ROCE趨勢中得出什麼?

The trend of ROCE doesn't look fantastic because it's fallen from 6.7% five years ago, while the business's capital employed increased by 136%. Usually this isn't ideal, but given AviChina Industry & Technology conducted a capital raising before their most recent earnings announcement, that would've likely contributed, at least partially, to the increased capital employed figure. It's unlikely that all of the funds raised have been put to work yet, so as a consequence AviChina Industry & Technology might not have received a full period of earnings contribution from it. Also, we found that by looking at the company's latest EBIT, the figure is within 10% of the previous year's EBIT so you can basically assign the ROCE drop primarily to that capital raise.

ROCE的趨勢看起來並不理想,因爲它從五年前的6.7%下降了,而該企業的使用資本增長了136%。通常,這並不理想,但鑑於中航工業與科技在發佈最新業績之前進行了融資,這可能至少部分地促進了已動用資本數字的增加。目前籌集的所有資金不太可能全部投入使用,因此,中航工業與科技可能尚未從中獲得整段時間的收益捐款。此外,我們還發現,通過查看該公司最新的息稅前利潤,該數字在去年息稅前利潤的10%以內,因此您基本上可以將投資回報率下降主要歸因於該次融資。

On a separate but related note, it's important to know that AviChina Industry & Technology has a current liabilities to total assets ratio of 47%, which we'd consider pretty high. This effectively means that suppliers (or short-term creditors) are funding a large portion of the business, so just be aware that this can introduce some elements of risk. Ideally we'd like to see this reduce as that would mean fewer obligations bearing risks.

另一方面,重要的是要知道中航工業與科技的流動負債與總資產的比率爲47%,我們認爲這個比率相當高。這實際上意味着供應商(或短期債權人)正在爲業務的很大一部分提供資金,因此請注意,這可能會帶來一些風險因素。理想情況下,我們希望看到這種情況減少,因爲這意味着承擔風險的債務減少。

The Key Takeaway

關鍵要點

Bringing it all together, while we're somewhat encouraged by AviChina Industry & Technology's reinvestment in its own business, we're aware that returns are shrinking. And investors appear hesitant that the trends will pick up because the stock has fallen 29% in the last five years. Therefore based on the analysis done in this article, we don't think AviChina Industry & Technology has the makings of a multi-bagger.

綜上所述,儘管中航工業與科技對自有業務的再投資使我們感到有些鼓舞,但我們意識到回報正在萎縮。投資者似乎對趨勢的回升猶豫不決,因爲該股在過去五年中下跌了29%。因此,根據本文中的分析,我們認爲中航工業與科技不具備多袋機的優勢。

AviChina Industry & Technology does have some risks though, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for AviChina Industry & Technology that you might be interested in.

但是,中航工業與科技確實存在一些風險,我們已經發現了一個你可能會感興趣的中航工業與技術警告信號。

While AviChina Industry & Technology may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.

儘管AviChina工業與技術公司目前可能無法獲得最高的回報,但我們編制了一份目前股本回報率超過25%的公司清單。在這裏查看這個免費清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論