share_log

LKQ (NASDAQ:LKQ) Shareholders Will Want The ROCE Trajectory To Continue

LKQ (NASDAQ:LKQ) Shareholders Will Want The ROCE Trajectory To Continue

LKQ(納斯達克股票代碼:LKQ)股東將希望ROCE軌跡繼續下去
Simply Wall St ·  01/11 14:36

Finding a business that has the potential to grow substantially is not easy, but it is possible if we look at a few key financial metrics. One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. Basically this means that a company has profitable initiatives that it can continue to reinvest in, which is a trait of a compounding machine. With that in mind, we've noticed some promising trends at LKQ (NASDAQ:LKQ) so let's look a bit deeper.

尋找具有大幅增長潛力的企業並不容易,但如果我們看幾個關鍵的財務指標,這是可能的。一種常見的方法是嘗試找一家公司 回報 論資本使用率(ROCE)在增加的同時增長 金額 所用資本的比例。基本上,這意味着公司擁有可以繼續進行再投資的盈利計劃,這是複合機器的特徵。考慮到這一點,我們注意到LKQ(納斯達克股票代碼:LKQ)的一些令人鼓舞的趨勢,所以讓我們更深入地了解一下。

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

什麼是資本使用回報率(ROCE)?

Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for LKQ:

爲了澄清一下你是否不確定,ROCE是評估公司從投資於其業務的資本中獲得多少稅前收入(按百分比計算)的指標。分析師使用這個公式來計算 LKQ 的值:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)

0.12 = US$1.4b ÷ (US$15b - US$3.6b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).

0.12 = 14億美元 ÷(150億美元-36億美元) (基於截至2023年9月的過去十二個月)

Therefore, LKQ has an ROCE of 12%. In absolute terms, that's a pretty standard return but compared to the Retail Distributors industry average it falls behind.

因此,LKQ 的投資回報率爲 12%。從絕對值來看,這是一個相當標準的回報,但與零售分銷商行業的平均水平相比,它落後了。

Check out our latest analysis for LKQ

查看我們對 LKQ 的最新分析

roce
NasdaqGS:LKQ Return on Capital Employed January 11th 2024
納斯達克GS: LKQ 2024年1月11日動用資本回報率

Above you can see how the current ROCE for LKQ compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering LKQ here for free.

上面你可以看到LKQ當前的投資回報率與其先前的資本回報率相比如何,但從過去可以看出來的只有那麼多。如果你願意,可以在這裏免費查看報道LKQ的分析師的預測。

What Can We Tell From LKQ's ROCE Trend?

我們可以從LKQ的投資回報率趨勢中得出什麼?

LKQ has not disappointed with their ROCE growth. More specifically, while the company has kept capital employed relatively flat over the last five years, the ROCE has climbed 32% in that same time. Basically the business is generating higher returns from the same amount of capital and that is proof that there are improvements in the company's efficiencies. The company is doing well in that sense, and it's worth investigating what the management team has planned for long term growth prospects.

LKQ並沒有對他們的投資回報率增長感到失望。更具體地說,儘管該公司在過去五年中一直保持相對平穩的資本使用率,但同期投資回報率增長了32%。基本上,該業務正在從相同數量的資本中獲得更高的回報,這證明了公司的效率有所提高。從這個意義上講,該公司表現良好,值得研究管理團隊對長期增長前景的計劃。

Our Take On LKQ's ROCE

我們對 LKQ 的 ROCE 的看法

As discussed above, LKQ appears to be getting more proficient at generating returns since capital employed has remained flat but earnings (before interest and tax) are up. And with a respectable 84% awarded to those who held the stock over the last five years, you could argue that these developments are starting to get the attention they deserve. With that being said, we still think the promising fundamentals mean the company deserves some further due diligence.

如上所述,LKQ似乎越來越擅長創造回報,因爲資本利用率保持不變,但收益(不計利息和稅收)有所增加。而且,在過去五年中持有該股票的人獲得了可觀的84%的獎勵,你可以說這些發展已開始得到應有的關注。話雖如此,我們仍然認爲前景良好的基本面意味着公司值得進一步的盡職調查。

If you'd like to know about the risks facing LKQ, we've discovered 3 warning signs that you should be aware of.

如果你想了解LKQ面臨的風險,我們發現了3個警告信號,你應該注意。

While LKQ isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.

儘管LKQ的回報率並不高,但請查看這份免費清單,列出了資產負債表穩健的股本回報率高的公司。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論