share_log

With 42% Ownership, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 42% Ownership, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

Robinhood Markets, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:HOOD)擁有 42% 的所有權,擁有強大的機構支持
Simply Wall St ·  01/09 06:39

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Robinhood Markets' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • 15% of Robinhood Markets is held by insiders
  • 高機構所有權意味着Robinhood Markets的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 52% 的業務由前8名股東持有
  • Robinhood Markets 15% 的股份由內部人士持有

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了Robinhood Markets, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:HOOD),了解該業務的所有權結構很重要。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲42%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Robinhood Markets, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Robinhood Markets的每種類型的所有者。

See our latest analysis for Robinhood Markets

查看我們對 Robinhood Markets 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:HOOD Ownership Breakdown January 9th 2024
NASDAQGS:HOOD 所有權明細 2024 年 1 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Robinhood Markets?

關於羅賓漢市場,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會變得更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會註冊一些機構,尤其是在它們成長的情況下。

We can see that Robinhood Markets does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Robinhood Markets, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Robinhood Markets確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Robinhood Markets過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:HOOD Earnings and Revenue Growth January 9th 2024
NASDAQGS: HOOD 收益和收入增長 2024 年 1 月 9 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Robinhood Markets. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Robinhood Markets' case, its Top Key Executive, Baiju Bhatt, is the largest shareholder, holding 7.7% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.7% and 7.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Vladimir Tenev is also a Chairman of the Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

對沖基金在羅賓漢市場的股票不多。因爲行動勝於雄辯,所以我們認爲當內部人士擁有公司的大量股份時,這是一個好兆頭。就羅賓漢市場而言,其最高主要高管百居·巴特是最大股東,持有7.7%的已發行股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的7.7%和7.1%。有趣的是,第三大股東弗拉基米爾·特內夫也是董事會主席,這再次表明該公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前8名股東佔股份登記冊的一半以上,少數較小的股東在一定程度上平衡較大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲你的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種很好的做法。有合理數量的分析師報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Robinhood Markets

羅賓漢市場的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Robinhood Markets, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$10b, and insiders have US$1.6b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有Robinhood Markets, Inc.合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲100億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值16億美元的股票。這非常重要。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Robinhood Markets. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有羅賓漢市場16%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 20%, private equity firms could influence the Robinhood Markets board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司持有20%的股份,可能會影響羅賓漢市場董事會。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 6.5%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的6.5%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

許多人發現深入了解一家公司過去的表現很有用。您可以訪問過去的收入、收入和現金流的詳細圖表。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是增長還是萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論