share_log

Despite Recent Sales, Super Strong Holdings Limited (HKG:8262) Insiders Still Control 54% of the Company

Despite Recent Sales, Super Strong Holdings Limited (HKG:8262) Insiders Still Control 54% of the Company

儘管最近有銷售,但超強控股有限公司(HKG: 8262)內部人士仍控制着該公司54%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  2023/12/12 17:51

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Super Strong Holdings implies vested interests in company growth
  • 54% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 對Super Strong Holdings的重大內部控制意味着公司增長具有既得利益
  • 54% 的業務由前四名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

Every investor in Super Strong Holdings Limited (HKG:8262) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 54% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

超強控股有限公司(HKG: 8262)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。個人內部人士持有54%的股份,擁有公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。

Insiders own the top position in the company's share registry despite recent sales and as a result, were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 58% gain.

儘管最近進行了銷售,但業內人士在公司股票登記處仍位居榜首,因此,他們是上週58%漲幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Super Strong Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下表開始,更深入地研究Super Strong Holdings的每種所有者。

View our latest analysis for Super Strong Holdings

查看我們對超強控股的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:8262 Ownership Breakdown December 12th 2023
香港交易所:8262 所有權明細 2023 年 12 月 12 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Super Strong Holdings?

關於超強控股,機構所有權的缺乏告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構投資者通常會避開規模太小、流動性太差或風險太大的公司,不符合他們的口味。但是,看到沒有任何機構投資者的大型公司是不尋常的。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Super Strong Holdings' earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

沒有機構擁有公司股份的原因可能多種多樣。通常,小型新上市公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理不可能在公司中建立有意義的地位。或者,該公司的某些方面可能使機構投資者望而卻步。Super Strong Holdings的收益和收入記錄(下圖)可能不會吸引機構投資者,或者他們可能根本沒有仔細研究過該業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:8262 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 12th 2023
香港交易所:8262 2023年12月12日收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Super Strong Holdings. Our data suggests that Tung Keung Kwok, who is also the company's Chief Compliance Officer, holds the most number of shares at 31%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. The second and third largest shareholders are Shanmin Ye and Long Liu, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.5%.

對沖基金在Super Strong Holdings的股票不多。我們的數據表明,同時也是公司首席合規官的郭東強持股最多,爲31%。當內部人士持有公司大量股票時,投資者會將其視爲一個積極的信號,因爲這表明內部人士願意將自己的財富綁定到公司的未來。第二和第三大股東是葉善民和劉龍,他們名下的股份數量相等,爲7.5%。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 54% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即公司約有54%的股份由前四名股東控制,這表明這些所有者對業務具有重大影響。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Super Strong Holdings

超強控股的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Super Strong Holdings Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of HK$1.1b, that means they have HK$584m worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有超強控股有限公司的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決策。鑑於其市值爲11億港元,這意味着他們擁有價值5.84億港元的股票。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望(免費)了解他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 46% stake in Super Strong Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Super Strong Holdings46%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Super Strong Holdings (at least 2 which are potentially serious) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管值得考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,以永遠存在的投資風險幽靈爲例。我們已經發現Super Strong Holdings的3個警告信號(至少有2個可能很嚴重),了解這些信號應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論