share_log

Chengjun Li Sprocomm Intelligence Limited's (HKG:1401) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 15%last Week

Chengjun Li Sprocomm Intelligence Limited's (HKG:1401) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 15%last Week

李成軍 Sprocomm Intelligence Limited (HKG: 1401) 首席執行官是最看漲的內部人士,他們的股票價值上週上漲了15%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/11/23 17:13

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Sprocomm Intelligence's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 2 shareholders own 67% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 業內人士似乎對Sprocomm Intelligence的增長有既得利益,從他們龐大的所有權可以看出
  • 前兩名股東擁有公司67%的股份
  • 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以讓人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

If you want to know who really controls Sprocomm Intelligence Limited (HKG:1401), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 67% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Sprocomm Intelligence Limited(HKG: 1401),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,個別內部人士擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲67%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 15% gain.

結果,內部人士是上週15%漲幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Sprocomm Intelligence, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下表開始,更深入地研究Sprocomm Intelligence的每種所有者。

Check out our latest analysis for Sprocomm Intelligence

查看我們對 Sprocomm Intelligence 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:1401 Ownership Breakdown November 23rd 2023
香港交易所:1401 所有權明細 2023 年 11 月 23 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sprocomm Intelligence?

關於Sprocomm Intelligence,缺乏機構所有權能告訴我們什麼?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我們傾向於看到機構投資者持有風險很高、交易量很少或規模很小的公司的股票。儘管我們有時確實會看到沒有機構的大型公司在登記冊,但這種情況並不特別常見。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Sprocomm Intelligence, for yourself, below.

沒有機構擁有公司股份的原因可能多種多樣。通常,小型的新上市公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理不可能在公司中建立有意義的地位。基金經理也可能不擁有這隻股票,因爲他們不相信股票會表現良好。機構投資者可能不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能還有其他因素在起作用。你可以在下面親眼看到Sprocomm Intelligence過去的收入表現。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:1401 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 23rd 2023
SEHK: 1401 2023年11月23日收益及收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Sprocomm Intelligence. The company's CEO Chengjun Li is the largest shareholder with 37% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 31% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.5% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Bin Xiong is also Senior Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

對沖基金在Sprocomm Intelligence中的股票不多。該公司首席執行官李成軍是最大股東,已發行股份的37%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約31%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有7.5%的所有權。有趣的是,第二大股東熊斌也是高級主要高管,這再次表明公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。據我們所知,分析師對該公司沒有報道,因此它可能被忽視了。

Insider Ownership Of Sprocomm Intelligence

Sprocomm 情報的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Sprocomm Intelligence Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a HK$2.3b stake in this HK$3.4b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有Sprocomm Intelligence Limited的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決策。因此,他們在這項34億港元的業務中擁有23億港元的股份。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示出與股東的強烈一致性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sprocomm Intelligence. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆擁有25%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成,對Sprocomm Intelligence有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以使政策決策向他們傾斜,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 7.5%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股票的7.5%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,在其中一傢俬營公司中擁有權益,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Sprocomm Intelligence (including 3 which shouldn't be ignored) .

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該了解我們在Sprocomm Intelligence中發現的4個警告信號(包括3個不容忽視的警告信號)。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最值得購買的股票。因此,請看看這份有趣的公司的免費免費清單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論