share_log

GR Life Style Company Limited's (HKG:108) Largest Shareholder, CEO Chunxian Wei Sees Holdings Value Fall by 22% Following Recent Drop

GR Life Style Company Limited's (HKG:108) Largest Shareholder, CEO Chunxian Wei Sees Holdings Value Fall by 22% Following Recent Drop

GR Life Style Company Limited(HKG: 108)的最大股東、首席執行官魏春賢認爲,繼最近的下跌之後,控股價值將下降22%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/10/25 18:44

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over GR Life Style implies vested interests in company growth
  • 70% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 對GR生活方式的重大內部控制意味著公司增長中的既得利益
  • 70%的業務由最大的兩個股東持有
  • 一家公司過去的業績以及所有權數據有助於對該公司的前景有一個很強的瞭解

If you want to know who really controls GR Life Style Company Limited (HKG:108), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 49% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了GR Life Style Company Limited(HKG:108),那麼你就得看看它的股票登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,個人內部人士以49%的所有權擁有公司的最大份額。換句話說,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 22%.

上週,內部人士遭受了最大的損失,該股下跌了22%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about GR Life Style.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們什麼關於GR Life Style。

See our latest analysis for GR Life Style

查看我們對GR生活方式的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:108 Ownership Breakdown October 25th 2023
聯交所:108擁有權分類2023年10月25日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GR Life Style?

機構所有權的缺失告訴了我們關於GR生活方式的什麼?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構投資者往往會避開那些規模太小、流動性太差或風險太高的公司,這些公司對他們的口味來說太小了。但在沒有任何機構投資者的情況下,看到較大的公司並不常見。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. GR Life Style's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

一家公司可能沒有在股票登記處登記任何機構的原因有很多。如果流動性(每天交易的股票數量)很低,機構可能很難購買大量股票。如果該公司不需要籌集資金,機構可能缺乏建立頭寸的機會。基金經理也有可能不持有這只股票,因為他們不相信它會表現良好。GR Life Style的收益和收入記錄(見下文)對機構投資者來說可能並不具有說服力--或者他們可能只是沒有密切關注這項業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:108 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 25th 2023
聯交所:108盈利及收入增長2023年10月25日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in GR Life Style. The company's CEO Chunxian Wei is the largest shareholder with 45% of shares outstanding. With 25% and 4.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Gang Rui International Investment (HK) Limited and Zhongmin Sun are the second and third largest shareholders. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Zhongmin Sun is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

對沖基金持有的GR Life Style股票並不多。該公司首席執行官魏春賢是最大股東,持有45%的流通股。Gang瑞國際投資(香港)有限公司和中民新創分別佔已發行股份的25%和4.3%,分別為第二和第三大股東。有趣的是,第三大股東孫忠民也是董事會成員,這再次表明公司大股東中存在強烈的內部人所有權。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 70% stake.

對股東登記的更詳細的研究表明,兩個最大的股東通過他們70%的股份在公司擁有相當大的所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。目前,我們沒有注意到分析師對該股的報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of GR Life Style

GR生活方式的內部人所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌著領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時.然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力.在某些情況下,這可能是負面的.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in GR Life Style Company Limited. Insiders own HK$848m worth of shares in the HK$1.7b company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的資訊顯示,內部人士持有GR Life Style Company Limited的大量股份。內部人士持有這家市值17億港元的公司價值8.48億港元的股票。看到內部人士如此投資於這項業務,真是太好了。或許值得一查的是,這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over GR Life Style. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有25%股權的普通公眾,主要由個人投資者組成,對GR生活方式有一定程度的影響力。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 25%, of the GR Life Style stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

看來,私人公司擁有GR Life Style股票的25%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有一傢俬人公司來對上市公司感興趣,而不是以個人身分。雖然很難得出任何大致的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個值得進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - GR Life Style has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。以風險為例-GR生活方式有1個個警告標誌我們認為你應該意識到.

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意看看另一家公司--一家財務狀況可能更好的公司--那麼不要錯過這一點免費令人感興趣的公司名單,有強勁的財務數據支持。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數位是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間.這可能與全年的年度報告數位不一致.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫.或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是暗示Wallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性.我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議.它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況.我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析.請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內.Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉.

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論