share_log

Returns On Capital At Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) Have Hit The Brakes

Returns On Capital At Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) Have Hit The Brakes

Ecolab(紐約證券交易所代碼:ECL)的資本回報已經停滯不前
Simply Wall St ·  2023/10/09 07:31

If we want to find a potential multi-bagger, often there are underlying trends that can provide clues. Typically, we'll want to notice a trend of growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and alongside that, an expanding base of capital employed. Basically this means that a company has profitable initiatives that it can continue to reinvest in, which is a trait of a compounding machine. However, after briefly looking over the numbers, we don't think Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) has the makings of a multi-bagger going forward, but let's have a look at why that may be.

如果我們想找到潛在的多袋裝袋機,通常有一些潛在的趨勢可以提供線索。通常,我們希望注意到增長的趨勢 返回 在資本使用率(ROCE)方面,除此之外,還在擴大 基礎 所用資本的百分比。基本上,這意味着一家公司有可以繼續進行再投資的盈利計劃,這是複合機的一個特徵。但是,在簡要查看了數字之後,我們不認爲 Ecolab 紐約證券交易所代碼:ECL)未來有多袋裝箱的氣質,但讓我們來看看爲什麼會這樣。

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

什麼是資本使用回報率(ROCE)?

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Ecolab:

對於那些不知道的人,投資回報率是衡量公司相對於企業所用資本的年度稅前利潤(回報)的衡量標準。分析師使用以下公式爲 Ecolab 計算它:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

使用資本回報率 = 利息和稅前收益 (EBIT) ÷(總資產-流動負債)

0.12 = US$2.0b ÷ (US$21b - US$4.5b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2023).

0.12 = 20億美元 ε(210億美元至45億美元) (基於截至 2023 年 6 月的過去十二個月)

Thus, Ecolab has an ROCE of 12%. In absolute terms, that's a pretty normal return, and it's somewhat close to the Chemicals industry average of 11%.

因此, Ecolab的投資回報率爲12%。 從絕對值來看,這是一個相當正常的回報,略接近化工行業11%的平均水平。

See our latest analysis for Ecolab

查看我們對 Ecolab 的最新分析

roce
NYSE:ECL Return on Capital Employed October 9th 2023
紐約證券交易所:ECL 2023年10月9日動用資本回報率

Above you can see how the current ROCE for Ecolab compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

在上面你可以看到Ecolab當前的投資回報率與其之前的資本回報率相比如何,但從過去可以看出來的只有那麼多。如果您有興趣,可以在我們的網站上查看分析師的預測 免費的 分析師對公司的預測報告。

The Trend Of ROCE

ROCE 的趨勢

There hasn't been much to report for Ecolab's returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. This tells us the company isn't reinvesting in itself, so it's plausible that it's past the growth phase. So unless we see a substantial change at Ecolab in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger. This probably explains why Ecolab is paying out 33% of its income to shareholders in the form of dividends. Unless businesses have highly compelling growth opportunities, they'll typically return some money to shareholders.

關於Ecolab的回報及其資本使用水平,沒有太多可報告的,因爲在過去五年中,這兩個指標都保持穩定。這告訴我們,該公司並沒有對自己進行再投資,因此它已經過了增長階段是合理的。因此,除非我們看到Ecolab在投資回報率和進行額外投資方面發生重大變化,否則我們不會屏住呼吸它成爲一個多重包裝商。這也許可以解釋爲什麼Ecolab將其收入的33%以股息的形式支付給股東。除非企業擁有極具吸引力的增長機會,否則他們通常會向股東返還一些資金。

The Bottom Line

底線

In summary, Ecolab isn't compounding its earnings but is generating stable returns on the same amount of capital employed. Unsurprisingly, the stock has only gained 22% over the last five years, which potentially indicates that investors are accounting for this going forward. Therefore, if you're looking for a multi-bagger, we'd propose looking at other options.

總而言之,Ecolab並沒有複利收益,而是在使用相同數量的資本的情況下產生穩定的回報。毫不奇怪,該股在過去五年中僅上漲了22%,這可能表明投資者正在考慮未來的情況。因此,如果您正在尋找多袋裝袋,我們建議您考慮其他選擇。

One more thing, we've spotted 1 warning sign facing Ecolab that you might find interesting.

還有一件事,我們發現了 1 個警告標誌 面對你可能會覺得有趣的 Ecolab。

While Ecolab may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.

儘管Ecolab目前可能無法獲得最高的回報,但我們編制了一份目前股本回報率超過25%的公司名單。看看這個 免費的 在這裏列出。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 取得聯繫 直接和我們在一起。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。 我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街在上述任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論