share_log

Fire Rock Holdings Limited's (HKG:1909) Market Cap Dropped HK$476m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt

Fire Rock Holdings Limited's (HKG:1909) Market Cap Dropped HK$476m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt

火岩控股有限公司 (HKG: 1909) 市值上週下降4.76億港元;個人投資者首當其衝
Simply Wall St ·  2023/10/04 21:42

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Fire Rock Holdings' significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 49% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
  • 46% of Fire Rock Holdings is held by insiders
  • Fire Rock Holdings的重要個人投資者所有權表明,關鍵決策受到廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 49% 的業務由前14名股東持有
  • Fire Rock Holdings 46%的股份由內部人士持有

Every investor in Fire Rock Holdings Limited (HKG:1909) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

火岩控股有限公司(HKG: 1909)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有公司的大部分股份,擁有51%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

While insiders who own 46% came under pressure after market cap dropped to HK$1.2b last week,individual investors took the most losses.

儘管持有46%的內部人士在上週市值跌至12億港元后承受壓力,但個人投資者遭受的損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Fire Rock Holdings.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Fire Rock Holdings的信息。

Check out our latest analysis for Fire Rock Holdings

查看我們對 Fire Rock Holdings 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:1909 Ownership Breakdown October 5th 2023
香港聯交所:1909 所有權明細 2023 年 10 月 5 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fire Rock Holdings?

關於火岩控股,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Less than 5% of Fire Rock Holdings is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.

Fire Rock Holdings只有不到5%的股份由機構投資者持有。這表明有些基金將目光投向了該公司,但許多基金尚未購買該公司的股票。如果業務從現在開始變得更強大,我們可能會看到越來越多的機構熱衷於收購的情況。如果多個機構投資者試圖同時買入一隻股票,股價大幅上漲的情況並不少見。因此,請查看下面的歷史收益軌跡,但請記住,最重要的是未來。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:1909 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 5th 2023
香港聯交所:1909 年盈利和收入增長 2023 年 10 月 5 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Fire Rock Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is Yan Zhang, with ownership of 41%. With 5.0% and 2.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Po Hu and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到,對沖基金對Fire Rock Holdings沒有有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是張巖,持有41%的所有權。Po Hu和The Vanguard Group, Inc.分別佔已發行股票的5.0%和2.2%,是第二和第三大股東。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 14 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現14位大股東共同擁有的股份不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Fire Rock Holdings

火岩控股的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Fire Rock Holdings Limited. It has a market capitalization of just HK$1.2b, and insiders have HK$546m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有Fire Rock Holdings Limited合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲12億港元,內部人士以自己的名義擁有價值5.46億港元的股票。我們可以說這表明與股東保持一致,但值得注意的是,該公司規模仍然很小;一些內部人士可能已經創立了這家公司。你可以點擊此處查看這些內部人士是買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 51% of Fire Rock Holdings. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有Fire Rock Holdings51%的股份。這種所有權水平賦予了來自廣大公衆的投資者一定的權力,可以影響董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付率等關鍵政策決策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Fire Rock Holdings you should be aware of.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。一個很好的例子:我們發現了 火岩控股有 2 個警告標誌 你應該知道。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然 這可能不是最值得買的股票。所以來看看這個 免費的 免費的 有趣的公司名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 取得聯繫 直接和我們在一起。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。 我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街在上述任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論