share_log

Sprocomm Intelligence Limited's (HKG:1401) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Chengjun Li, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 45% Last Week

Sprocomm Intelligence Limited's (HKG:1401) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Chengjun Li, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 45% Last Week

Sprocomm Intelligence Limited(HKG: 1401)最看漲的內幕人士是首席執行官李成軍,他們的持股價值上週上漲了45%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/08/24 18:44

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Sprocomm Intelligence implies vested interests in company growth
  • 67% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 對Sprocomm Intelligence的重大內部控制意味著公司增長中的既得利益
  • 67%的業務由最大的兩個股東持有
  • 使用來自公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司未來的業績

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Sprocomm Intelligence Limited (HKG:1401), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 67% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了Sprocomm Intelligence Limited(HKG:1401),瞭解該企業的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,個人內部人士擁有公司的最大份額,擁有67%的股份。換句話說,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$2.4b market cap following a 45% gain in the stock.

因此,內部人士上週得分最高,該公司市值達到24億港元,此前該股上漲45%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Sprocomm Intelligence, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下面的圖表開始,更深入地研究Sprocomm Intelligence的每種類型的所有者。

Check out our latest analysis for Sprocomm Intelligence

查看我們對Sprocomm Intelligence的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:1401 Ownership Breakdown August 24th 2023
聯交所:1401所有權分類2023年8月24日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sprocomm Intelligence?

關於Sprocomm Intelligence,缺乏機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構投資者往往會避開那些規模太小、流動性太差或風險太高的公司,這些公司對他們的口味來說太小了。但在沒有任何機構投資者的情況下,看到較大的公司並不常見。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Sprocomm Intelligence, for yourself, below.

對於機構為何不持有股票,有多種解釋。最常見的是,相對於管理下的資金,該公司規模太小,因此該機構不會費心密切關注該公司。另一方面,專業投資者總是可能會避開一家公司,因為他們認為這不是他們投資的最佳地方。機構投資者可能不會覺得這項業務的歷史性增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。你可以在下面看到Sprocomm Intelligence過去的收入表現。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:1401 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 24th 2023
聯交所:1401盈利及收入增長2023年8月24日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Sprocomm Intelligence. The company's CEO Chengjun Li is the largest shareholder with 37% of shares outstanding. Bin Xiong is the second largest shareholder owning 31% of common stock, and Jz Capital Limited holds about 7.5% of the company stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Bin Xiong is also Senior Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Sprocomm Intelligence進行有意義的投資。該公司首席執行官Li是第一大股東,持有37%的流通股。熊斌是第二大股東,持有31%的普通股,JZ Capital Limited持有約7.5%的公司股份。有趣的是,第二大股東熊斌也是高級關鍵高管,他再次指出,公司最大股東中存在強大的內部人所有權。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

為了讓我們的研究更有趣,我們發現,前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味著他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。目前,我們沒有注意到分析師對該股的報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Sprocomm Intelligence

Sprocomm Intelligence的內部人所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的.公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事.然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Sprocomm Intelligence Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of HK$2.4b, that means they have HK$1.6b worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有Sprocomm Intelligence Limited的大部分股份。這意味著他們可以集體為公司做出決定。鑑於其市值為24億港元,這意味著他們擁有價值16億港元的股票。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望發現(免費)如果他們一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sprocomm Intelligence. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有25%的股份,普通公眾,主要由個人投資者組成,對Sprocomm Intelligence有一定程度的影響力。雖然這群人不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 7.5%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有7.5%的已發行股份。僅從這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司擁有上市公司的股份。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Sprocomm Intelligence you should be aware of, and 2 of them shouldn't be ignored.

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他資訊。一個恰當的例子:我們發現了Sprocomm Intelligence的3個警告信號你應該意識到,其中有兩個不應該被忽視。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然了這可能不是最值得購買的股票。。因此,您可能希望看到我們的免費一組有趣的潛在客戶,擁有有利的財務狀況。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數位是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間.這可能與全年的年度報告數位不一致.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫.或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是暗示Wallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性.我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議.它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況.我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析.請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內.Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉.

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論