share_log

Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Mabpharm Limited's (HKG:2181) Market Cap Rises to HK$3.1b

Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Mabpharm Limited's (HKG:2181) Market Cap Rises to HK$3.1b

隨着Mabpharm Limited(HKG: 2181)的市值升至31億港元,業內人士成爲主要受益者
Simply Wall St ·  2023/07/14 18:24

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Mabpharm's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 68% ownership
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 內部人士似乎在Mabpharm的增長中擁有既得利益,這一點從他們的大量所有權中可以看出
  • 共有2名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,持有68%的股權
  • 使用來自公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司未來的業績

Every investor in Mabpharm Limited (HKG:2181) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Mabpharm Limited(HKG:2181)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團,準確地說約為50%左右,是個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團面臨著最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by HK$1.1b last week.

顯然,在該公司市值上週上漲11億港元后,內部人士受益最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Mabpharm.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Mabpharm的什麼。

See our latest analysis for Mabpharm

查看我們對Mabpharm的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2181 Ownership Breakdown July 14th 2023
聯交所:2181擁有權分類2023年7月14日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mabpharm?

機構所有權的缺失告訴了我們關於Mabpharm的什麼?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活躍的小公司往往缺乏機構投資者,但大公司沒有機構投資者的情況較少。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Mabpharm, for yourself, below.

為什麼沒有機構持有一家公司的股票,可能有各種原因。通常情況下,新上市的小型公司不會引起基金經理太多關注,因為大型基金管理公司不可能在該公司建立有意義的頭寸。或者,該公司可能有某些方面讓機構投資者望而卻步。機構投資者可能不會覺得這項業務的歷史性增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。你可以在下面看到Mabpharm過去的收入表現。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2181 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 14th 2023
聯交所:2181盈利及收入增長2023年7月14日

Mabpharm is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Jianjun Guo, with ownership of 50%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 18% and 5.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

Mabpharm不為對沖基金所有。該公司第一大股東為郭建軍,持股50%。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的18%和5.2%。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 68% stake.

對股東登記的更詳細的研究表明,兩個最大的股東通過他們68%的股份在公司擁有相當大的所有權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。目前,我們沒有注意到分析師對該股的報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Mabpharm

Mabpharm的內部人士所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Mabpharm Limited. Insiders have a HK$1.5b stake in this HK$3.1b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎擁有Mabpharm Limited相當大的比例。在這筆31億港元的交易中,內部人士持有15億港元的股份。這可能表明,創始人仍持有大量股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是在買入還是在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in Mabpharm. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公眾通常是個人投資者,他們持有Mabpharm 23%的股份。雖然這群人不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 23% stake in Mabpharm. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有Mabpharm 23%的股份。這表明,他們可以在關鍵的政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權投資長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且--顧名思義--不會對上市公司進行太多投資。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售並將資本重新配置到其他地方。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 4.0%, of the Mabpharm stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

看起來私營公司擁有Mabpharm 4.0%的股份。或許有必要對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,如內部人士,對這些私營公司中的一家有利害關係,則應在年報中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Mabpharm .

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他資訊。為此,您應該意識到3個警示標誌我們發現了Mabpharm。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然了這可能不是最值得購買的股票。。所以讓我們來看看這個免費 免費有趣的公司名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數位是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數位不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論