share_log

TI Cloud Inc.'s (HKG:2167) Largest Shareholder, CEO Qiang Wu Sees Holdings Value Fall by 20% Following Recent Drop

TI Cloud Inc.'s (HKG:2167) Largest Shareholder, CEO Qiang Wu Sees Holdings Value Fall by 20% Following Recent Drop

TI Cloud Inc. 's (HKG: 2167) 最大股東、首席執行官吳強認爲控股價值在近期下跌後將下跌20%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/07/14 18:09

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in TI Cloud's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 內部人士似乎在TI Cloud的增長中擁有既得利益,這一點從他們的大規模所有權可以看出
  • 共有3名投資者持有該公司52%的多數股權
  • 所有權研究,結合過去的業績數據,可以幫助您更好地瞭解股票的機會

If you want to know who really controls TI Cloud Inc. (HKG:2167), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了TI Cloud Inc.(HKG:2167),那麼你必須看看它的股票註冊表的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團,準確地說約為50%左右,是個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。

As market cap fell to HK$1.7b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

隨著上週市值跌至17億港元,內部人士將面臨比該公司其他任何股東群體都要高的損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of TI Cloud, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下面的圖表開始,更深入地研究TI Cloud的每種類型的所有者。

View our latest analysis for TI Cloud

查看我們對TI Cloud的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2167 Ownership Breakdown July 14th 2023
聯交所:2167擁有權分類2023年7月14日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TI Cloud?

缺乏機構所有權告訴了我們關於TI Cloud的什麼資訊?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構投資者往往會避開那些規模太小、流動性太差或風險太高的公司,這些公司對他們的口味來說太小了。但在沒有任何機構投資者的情況下,看到較大的公司並不常見。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. TI Cloud's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

對於機構為何不持有股票,有多種解釋。最常見的是,相對於管理下的資金,該公司規模太小,因此該機構不會費心密切關注該公司。基金經理也有可能不持有這只股票,因為他們不相信它會表現良好。德州儀器雲的盈利和營收記錄(見下文)對機構投資者來說可能並不具有說服力--或者他們可能只是沒有密切關注這項業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2167 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 14th 2023
聯交所:2167盈利及收入增長2023年7月14日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 5.3% of TI Cloud. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Qiang Wu with 34% of shares outstanding. Fortune Ascend Holdings Ltd is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and Wei Pan holds about 7.8% of the company stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Wei Pan is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我們的數據顯示,對沖基金擁有TI Cloud 5.3%的股份。這引起了我的注意,因為對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來為股東創造短期價值的變化。看看我們的數據,我們可以看到,第一大股東是擁有34%流通股的CEO強武。富達控股有限公司是第二大股東,持有10%的普通股,潘瑋柏持有公司約7.8%的股份。有趣的是,第三大股東潘偉也是董事會成員,這再次表明公司大股東中存在強烈的內部人所有權。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

經過進一步挖掘,我們發現,前3名股東合計控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味著他們擁有相當大的權力來影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。雖然有一些分析師的報道,但該公司可能沒有得到廣泛的報道。因此,它可以獲得更多的關注,在賽道上。

Insider Ownership Of TI Cloud

TI Cloud的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個群體中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in TI Cloud Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just HK$1.7b, and insiders have HK$822m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的資訊表明,內部人士持有TI Cloud Inc.的大量股份。該公司市值僅為17億港元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值8.22億港元的股票。這可能表明,創始人仍持有大量股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是在買入還是在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 35% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over TI Cloud. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有35%股權的普通公眾,主要由個人投資者組成,對TI Cloud有一定程度的影響力。雖然這群人不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 10%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有10%的已發行股份。或許有必要對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,如內部人士,對這些私營公司中的一家有利害關係,則應在年報中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with TI Cloud .

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。為此,您應該意識到1個警告標誌我們發現了TI Cloud。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費分析師對該公司的預測報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數位是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數位不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論