share_log

Great Week for Ferguson Plc (NYSE:FERG) Institutional Investors After Losing 0.1% Over the Previous Year

Great Week for Ferguson Plc (NYSE:FERG) Institutional Investors After Losing 0.1% Over the Previous Year

弗格森公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:FERG)機構投資者的重要一周比上年度虧損 0.1%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/02/04 09:15

A look at the shareholders of Ferguson plc (NYSE:FERG) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 74% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看弗格森公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:FERG)的股東,我們就知道哪個集團最有權勢。而持有這塊蛋糕最大份額的是擁有74%股權的機構。也就是説,如果股價上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,該集團將損失最大)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 5.3% increase in share prices last week, given their one-year returns have been disappointing at 0.1%.

機構投資者會欣賞上週5.3%的股價漲幅,因為他們的一年回報率一直令人失望,只有0.1%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ferguson, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下面的圖表開始,更深入地研究弗格森的每一種類型的所有者。

Check out our latest analysis for Ferguson

看看我們對弗格森的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:FERG Ownership Breakdown February 4th 2023
紐約證券交易所:FERG所有權明細2023年2月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ferguson?

關於弗格森,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構以一個接近當地市場的指數來衡量它們的表現。因此,他們通常更關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

We can see that Ferguson does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ferguson, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,弗格森確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,看看弗格森過去的收入軌跡是值得的(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:FERG Earnings and Revenue Growth February 4th 2023
紐約證券交易所:FERG收益和收入增長2023年2月4日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 5.4% of Ferguson shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.4% and 4.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有一半以上的已發行股票,董事會可能不得不關注他們的偏好。看來,弗格森5.4%的股份由對衝基金控制。這一點值得注意,因為對衝基金往往是相當活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。先鋒集團(The Vanguard Group,Inc.)目前是該公司的最大股東,持有13%的流通股。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有5.4%和4.5%的流通股。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 21 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在進一步挖掘後,我們發現前21名股東合計持有公司50%的股份,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。有很多分析師在追蹤這隻股票,所以他們的預測可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Ferguson

弗格森的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our information suggests that Ferguson plc insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$25m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息顯示,弗格森公司內部人士持有該公司不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們預計內部人士只會持有它一小部分股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值2500萬美元的股票。看到董事會成員持有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司21%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種規模的所有權可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ferguson better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Ferguson has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

擁有一家公司股票的不同集團總是值得考慮的。但為了更好地瞭解弗格森,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險為例-弗格森有3個警示標誌我們認為你應該意識到。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終這就是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者將做得多好。因此,我們認為,看看這份免費報告是明智的,它顯示了分析師是否預測到了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論