share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease Lumen Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:LUMN) Institutional Owners After Losing 55% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease Lumen Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:LUMN) Institutional Owners After Losing 55% Over the Past Year

最近的上升可能會安撫流明科技有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:LUMN)機構所有者在過去一年中損失 55% 後
Simply Wall St ·  2023/02/02 13:30

If you want to know who really controls Lumen Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:LUMN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 77% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Lumen Technologies,Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:LUMN),那麼你就得看看它的股票登記簿的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團,準確地説約為77%,是機構。換句話説,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。

Last week's US$228m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 55% losses.

上週2.28億美元的市值增長可能會受到機構投資者的讚賞,特別是在經歷了55%的虧損之後。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lumen Technologies, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下面的圖表開始,更深入地研究Lumen Technologies的每種類型的所有者。

Check out our latest analysis for Lumen Technologies

查看我們對Lumen Technologies的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:LUMN Ownership Breakdown February 2nd 2023
紐約證券交易所:LUMN所有權明細2023年2月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lumen Technologies?

關於Lumen Technologies,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構以一個接近當地市場的指數來衡量它們的表現。因此,他們通常更關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lumen Technologies. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lumen Technologies' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Lumen Technologies擁有相當多的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是面臨“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這一風險更高。你可以在下面看到Lumen Technologies的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多的東西。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:LUMN Earnings and Revenue Growth February 2nd 2023
紐約證券交易所:LUMN收益和收入增長2023年2月2日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Lumen Technologies is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.4% and 6.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有一半以上的已發行股票,董事會可能不得不關注他們的偏好。Lumen Technologies並不屬於對衝基金。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到,第一大股東是先鋒集團,持有11%的流通股。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有9.4%和6.0%的流通股。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記表,我們可以看到,前16名股東控制了51%的所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有所有權的多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。有很多分析師在追蹤這隻股票,所以他們的預測可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Lumen Technologies

Lumen Technologies的內部人所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$51m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士持有Lumen Technologies,Inc.的股份不到1%。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值5100萬美元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。可以説,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。你可以點擊這裏,看看內部人士是在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司22%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Lumen Technologies has 3 warning signs (and 2 which are a bit concerning) we think you should know about.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。以風險為例-Lumen Technologies3個警示標誌(和2個有點令人擔憂的問題)我們認為你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終這就是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者將做得多好。因此,我們認為,看看這份免費報告是明智的,它顯示了分析師是否預測到了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論