share_log

The Recent US$196m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (NASDAQ:HOLO)

The Recent US$196m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (NASDAQ:HOLO)

近期 1.6 億美元的市值下降可能令內部人士對微雲全息圖公司(NASDAQ:HOLO)投資令內部人士感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/31 08:45

To get a sense of who is truly in control of MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (NASDAQ:HOLO), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 81% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

為了弄清楚誰真正控制了微雲全息圖像公司(納斯達克:HOLO),瞭解該企業的所有權結構是很重要的。持有該公司股份最多的集團,準確地説約為81%,是個人內部人士。換句話説,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。

As market cap fell to US$439m last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

隨着市值上週跌至4.39億美元,內部人士將面臨比該公司任何其他股東羣體都要高的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about MicroCloud Hologram.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於微雲全息圖的什麼。

View our latest analysis for MicroCloud Hologram

查看我們對微雲全息圖的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:HOLO Ownership Breakdown January 31st 2023
NasdaqCM:2023年1月31日全息所有權明細

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MicroCloud Hologram?

機構所有權的缺乏告訴了我們關於微雲全息圖的什麼?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我們不傾向於看到機構投資者持有風險很高、交易清淡或規模很小的公司的股票。儘管我們有時確實會看到大公司沒有登記在冊的機構,但這種情況並不特別常見。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. MicroCloud Hologram might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

對於機構為何不持有股票,有多種解釋。最常見的是,相對於管理下的資金,該公司規模太小,因此該機構不會費心密切關注該公司。或者,該公司可能有某些方面讓機構投資者望而卻步。微雲全息圖可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的表現,或者他們只是沒有仔細研究過這項業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:HOLO Earnings and Revenue Growth January 31st 2023
納斯達克CM:Holo收益和收入增長2023年1月31日

MicroCloud Hologram is not owned by hedge funds. Wei Peng is currently the largest shareholder, with 16% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 13% and 10.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Guohui Kang, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

微雲全息圖不為對衝基金所有。魏鵬目前是第一大股東,持有16%的流通股。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的13%和10.0%。第三大股東康國輝也恰好擁有董事會成員的頭銜。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 58% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即公司約58%的股份由前5名股東控制,這表明這些所有者對業務具有重大影響。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司的報道,所以它很可能在雷達下飛行。

Insider Ownership Of MicroCloud Hologram

微雲全息圖的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of MicroCloud Hologram Inc.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own US$357m worth of shares in the US$439m company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有MicroCloud Hologram Inc.一半以上的股份。這讓他們有效地控制了公司。這意味着他們持有這家市值4.39億美元的公司價值3.57億美元的股票。這是很有意義的。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over MicroCloud Hologram. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有18%的股份,普通公眾,主要由個人投資者組成,對微雲全息圖有一定程度的影響力。雖然這羣人不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for MicroCloud Hologram (2 are concerning) that you should be aware of.

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定微雲全息圖的3個警告信號(2)你應該知道的。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然了這可能不是最值得購買的股票。。因此,您可能希望看到我們的免費一組有趣的潛在客户,擁有有利的財務狀況。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論