share_log

Lowe's Companies, Inc. (NYSE:LOW) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 77% of the Company

Lowe's Companies, Inc. (NYSE:LOW) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 77% of the Company

Lowe 公司股份有限公司(紐約證交所代碼:LOW)在很大程度上由擁有 77% 公司的機構股東控制
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/30 08:15

Every investor in Lowe's Companies, Inc. (NYSE:LOW) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 77% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Lowe‘s Companies,Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:LOW)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東羣體。持有該公司股份最多的集團,準確地説約為77%,是機構。換句話説,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構所有者擁有巨大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的份量,特別是對個人投資者來説。因此,大量的機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視為一種積極的屬性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lowe's Companies.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了洛威公司的不同所有權集團。

View our latest analysis for Lowe's Companies

查看我們對洛威公司的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:LOW Ownership Breakdown January 30th 2023
紐約證券交易所:2023年1月30日低所有權細分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lowe's Companies?

關於洛威的公司,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這隻股票變得更加熱情。我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下。

Lowe's Companies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lowe's Companies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

洛威的公司已經在股票登記處登記了機構。事實上,他們在該公司擁有可觀的股份。這意味着為這些機構工作的分析師已經看過了這隻股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,查看洛威公司過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:LOW Earnings and Revenue Growth January 30th 2023
紐約證券交易所:低收益和低收入增長2023年1月30日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lowe's Companies. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.1% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.4% and 4.5% of the stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。對衝基金在洛威的公司中持有的股份並不多。先鋒集團(The Vanguard Group,Inc.)目前是該公司的最大股東,持有9.1%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東分別持有約7.4%和4.5%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東總共控制着公司不到一半的股份,這意味着公司的股票被廣泛傳播,沒有佔主導地位的股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師追蹤該股,因此瞭解他們對未來的總體看法可能是有用的。

Insider Ownership Of Lowe's Companies

Lowe‘s公司的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌着領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Lowe's Companies, Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$87m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士以個人名義持有Lowe‘s Companies,Inc.不到1%的股份。由於規模如此之大,我們不會指望內部人士會持有很大比例的股票。他們總共擁有8700萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人士一直在買入還是賣出,可能會更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司23%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種規模的所有權可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Lowe's Companies (at least 1 which can't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,考慮一下無處不在的投資風險幽靈。我們已經確定了三個警告信號Lowe的公司(至少有一家不能被忽視),瞭解它們應該是你投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你更願意瞭解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這一預期免費關於分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論