share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease Coursera, Inc. (NYSE:COUR) Institutional Owners After Losing 23% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease Coursera, Inc. (NYSE:COUR) Institutional Owners After Losing 23% Over the Past Year

最近的上漲可能會安撫 Coursera, Inc.(紐約證交所代碼:Cour)機構所有者在過去一年中損失 23% 後
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/30 08:11

A look at the shareholders of Coursera, Inc. (NYSE:COUR) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看Coursera,Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:COUR)的股東就能知道哪個集團最有權勢。我們可以看到,機構擁有公司的最大份額,擁有54%的股權。也就是説,如果股價上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,該集團將損失最大)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 13% increase in share prices after a year of 23% losses as a sign that returns are likely to begin trending higher.

機構投資者可能會歡迎上週股價在經歷了23%的虧損後上漲13%,認為這是回報可能開始走高的跡象。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Coursera.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Coursera的不同所有權組。

See our latest analysis for Coursera

查看我們對Coursera的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:COUR Ownership Breakdown January 30th 2023
紐約證券交易所:Cour所有權明細2023年1月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Coursera?

關於Coursera,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這隻股票變得更加熱情。我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下。

We can see that Coursera does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Coursera's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,Coursera確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是面臨“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這一風險更高。你可以在下面看到Coursera的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多的東西。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:COUR Earnings and Revenue Growth January 30th 2023
紐約證券交易所:Cour收益和收入增長2023年1月30日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It would appear that 5.2% of Coursera shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Our data shows that Baillie Gifford & Co. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 11% of the stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。Coursera 5.2%的股份似乎由對衝基金控制。這一點值得注意,因為對衝基金往往是相當活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。我們的數據顯示,Baillie Gifford&Co.是最大的股東,持有12%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東分別持有約12%和11%的股份。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前6名股東佔到了股東名冊的一半以上,少數小股東在一定程度上平衡了大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。有很多分析師在追蹤這隻股票,所以他們的預測可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Coursera

Coursera的內部人所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Coursera, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$168m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告,內部人士確實持有Coursera,Inc.的股份。這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的結盟是件好事。內部人士持有價值1.68億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果你想探討內部人結盟的問題,你可以點擊這裏,看看內部人是一直在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Coursera. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公眾通常是個人投資者,他們持有Coursera 11%的股份。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 22%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

擁有22%股權的私募股權公司有能力在塑造專注於價值創造的公司戰略方面發揮作用。一些人可能會喜歡這樣,因為私人股本有時是讓管理層承擔責任的積極分子。但在其他時候,私募股權公司讓公司上市後,它們的股票都賣光了。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Coursera you should know about.

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮一下風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現Coursera的3個警告標誌你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終這就是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者將做得多好。因此,我們認為,看看這份免費報告是明智的,它顯示了分析師是否預測到了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論