share_log

With 34% Ownership in Biomea Fusion, Inc. (NASDAQ:BMEA), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 34% Ownership in Biomea Fusion, Inc. (NASDAQ:BMEA), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

在生物群融合有限公司(NASDAQ:BMEA)擁有 34% 的所有權,機構投資者在業務上有很多騎行
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/19 09:05

If you want to know who really controls Biomea Fusion, Inc. (NASDAQ:BMEA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 34% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Biomea Fusion,Inc.(納斯達克代碼:BMEA),那麼你就得看看它的股票登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有公司的最大份額,擁有34%的股權。換句話説,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$64m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 27%.

在該公司上週市值上漲6400萬美元后,機構投資者的情況正在好轉。上週的漲幅將進一步提高一年的股東回報率,目前股東回報率為27%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Biomea Fusion.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們什麼關於Biomea Fusion。

See our latest analysis for Biomea Fusion

查看我們對Biomea Fusion的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:BMEA Ownership Breakdown January 19th 2023
NasdaqGS:BMEA所有權明細2023年1月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Biomea Fusion?

關於Biomea Fusion,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構以一個接近當地市場的指數來衡量它們的表現。因此,他們通常更關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

Biomea Fusion already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Biomea Fusion's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Biomea Fusion已經在股票登記處登記了機構。事實上,他們在該公司擁有可觀的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是面臨“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這一風險更高。你可以在下面看到Biomea Fusion的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多的東西。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:BMEA Earnings and Revenue Growth January 19th 2023
NasdaqGS:BMEA收益和收入增長2023年1月19日

It looks like hedge funds own 18% of Biomea Fusion shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is A2A Pharmaceuticals, Inc., with ownership of 15%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 9.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Thomas Butler, the CEO has 1.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

看起來對衝基金擁有Biomea Fusion 18%的股份。這一點值得注意,因為對衝基金往往是相當活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。該公司的最大股東是A2A製藥公司,持有15%的股份。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有11%和9.6%的流通股。此外,我們發現,首席執行官託馬斯·巴特勒有1.1%的股份分配給了他們的名字。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查後,我們發現該公司超過一半的股份由前7名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小股東平衡了。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。有很多分析師在追蹤這隻股票,所以他們的預測可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Biomea Fusion

Biomea Fusion的內部人所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Biomea Fusion, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$3.9m worth of stock in the US$276m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士持有Biomea Fusion,Inc.的一些股份。內部人士以自己的名義持有這家市值2.76億美元的公司價值390萬美元的股票。這至少表明了一些一致。你可以點擊這裏,看看這些內部人士是一直在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司32%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 15%, of the Biomea Fusion stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

似乎私營公司擁有Biomea Fusion 15%的股份。或許有必要對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,如內部人士,對這些私營公司中的一家有利害關係,則應在年報中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Biomea Fusion you should be aware of, and 2 of them make us uncomfortable.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。一個恰當的例子:我們發現了生物羣融合的4個警告信號你應該知道,其中兩個讓我們感到不舒服。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你更願意瞭解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這一預期免費關於分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論