-
市場
-
產品
-
資訊
-
Moo社區
-
課堂
-
查看更多
-
功能介紹
-
費用費用透明，無最低余額限制
投資選擇、功能介紹、費用相關信息由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供
- English
- 中文繁體
- 中文简体
- 深色
- 淺色
Getaround (NYSE:GETR) Versus HyreCar (NASDAQ:HYRE) Head to Head Analysis
Getaround (NYSE:GETR) Versus HyreCar (NASDAQ:HYRE) Head to Head Analysis
HyreCar (NASDAQ:HYRE – Get Rating) and Getaround (NYSE:GETR – Get Rating) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends and profitability.
Analyst Ratings
This is a summary of recent ratings for HyreCar and Getaround, as reported by MarketBeat.com.
Get HyreCar alerts:| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| HyreCar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.00 |
| Getaround | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3.00 |
HyreCar presently has a consensus price target of $5.67, suggesting a potential upside of 909.38%. Getaround has a consensus price target of $3.25, suggesting a potential upside of 357.75%. Given HyreCar's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe HyreCar is more favorable than Getaround.
Volatility and Risk
HyreCar has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Getaround has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.Insider & Institutional Ownership
62.9% of HyreCar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.6% of Getaround shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of HyreCar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Profitability
This table compares HyreCar and Getaround's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| HyreCar | -46.03% | -1,016.64% | -128.82% |
| Getaround | N/A | N/A | -0.10% |
Valuation and Earnings
This table compares HyreCar and Getaround's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| HyreCar | $35.72 million | 0.48 | -$25.95 million | ($0.81) | -0.69 |
| Getaround | N/A | N/A | -$2.62 million | N/A | N/A |
Getaround has lower revenue, but higher earnings than HyreCar.
Summary
Getaround beats HyreCar on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.
About HyreCar
(Get Rating)
HyreCar, Inc. engages in the operation of a peer-to-peer car-sharing marketplace. Its services allow car owners to rent their idle cars to ridesharing service drivers. The company was founded by Anshu Bansal and Abhishek Arora in September 2014 and is headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
About Getaround
(Get Rating)
Getaround, Inc. provides on-line car rental and peer-to-peer car-sharing services in California. The company's fleet include SUV, hatchback, cargo and passenger minivan, convertible SUV, coupe, crew and extended cab, cargo and passenger van, regular-cab, sedan, and wagon. As of March 31, 2022, it operated approximately 66,000 cars in over 950 cities across 8 countries worldwide, including the United States and across Europe. The company was incorporated in 2009 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.
Receive News & Ratings for HyreCar Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for HyreCar and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
HyreCar (NASDAQ:HYRE – Get Rating) and Getaround (NYSE:GETR – Get Rating) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends and profitability.
HyReCAR（納斯達克：HYRE-獲得評級）和 GetARound（紐約證券交易所代碼：GETR-獲取評級）都是小型運輸公司，但哪個投資更好？我們將根據兩家公司的機構所有權，分析師建議，風險，估值，收益，股息和盈利能力來比較兩家公司。
Analyst Ratings
分析師評級
This is a summary of recent ratings for HyreCar and Getaround, as reported by MarketBeat.com.
這是最近評分的摘要，根據市場比亞網的報導。
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| HyreCar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.00 |
| Getaround | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3.00 |
| 銷售評級 | 保留評分 | 購買評級 | 強大的買入評級 | 評級分數 | |
| 水力卡 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.00 |
| 火山獵犬 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3.00 |
HyreCar presently has a consensus price target of $5.67, suggesting a potential upside of 909.38%. Getaround has a consensus price target of $3.25, suggesting a potential upside of 357.75%. Given HyreCar's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe HyreCar is more favorable than Getaround.
目前，目前的一致價格目標為 5.67 美元，表明潛在的上行空間為 909.38％。GetARound 的共識價格目標為 3.25 美元，表明潛在的上行空間為 357.75％。鑑於 HyReCar 的較高可能上行空間，分析師清楚地認為 HyReCAR 比 GetARound 更有利。
Volatility and Risk
波動性和風險
Insider & Institutional Ownership
內幕和機構所有權
62.9% of HyreCar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.6% of Getaround shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of HyreCar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
62.9% 的股票由機構投資者持有。相比之下，有 76.6% 的 GetARound 股份是由機構投資者持有的。有 9.1% 的 HyReCar 股份是由公司內部人士持有。強大的機構所有權表明，捐贈基金，大型資金經理和對沖基金認為公司長期的表現將優於市場。
Profitability
盈利
This table compares HyreCar and Getaround's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
此表格比較了 HyReCar 和 GetARound 的淨利潤率、權益回報率和資產回報率。
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| HyreCar | -46.03% | -1,016.64% | -128.82% |
| Getaround | N/A | N/A | -0.10% |
| 淨利潤 | 權益回報率 | 資產回報率 | |
| 水力卡 | -46.03% | -1,016.64% | -128.82% |
| 火山獵犬 | N/A | N/A | -0.10% |
Valuation and Earnings
估值及收益
This table compares HyreCar and Getaround's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.
此表格比較了快速和 GetARound 的總收入，每股盈利（EPS）和估值。
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| HyreCar | $35.72 million | 0.48 | -$25.95 million | ($0.81) | -0.69 |
| Getaround | N/A | N/A | -$2.62 million | N/A | N/A |
| 總收入 | 價格/銷售比率 | 淨收入 | 每股盈利 | 市盈比率 | |
| 水力卡 | 三千五百萬美元 | 0.48 | -二千五百五十五萬美元 | (0.81 元) | -0.69 |
| 火山獵犬 | N/A | N/A | -262 萬美元 | N/A | N/A |
Getaround has lower revenue, but higher earnings than HyreCar.
百合犬的收入較低，但收益高於 HyRecar。
Summary
摘要
Getaround beats HyreCar on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.
兩隻股票之間的 10 個因素中的 6 個比較，GetARound 擊敗了 Hyrecar。
About HyreCar
關於凱力卡
(Get Rating)
(取得評分)
HyreCar, Inc. engages in the operation of a peer-to-peer car-sharing marketplace. Its services allow car owners to rent their idle cars to ridesharing service drivers. The company was founded by Anshu Bansal and Abhishek Arora in September 2014 and is headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
HyReCar 公司從事對等汽車共享市場的運營。它的服務使車主可以將閒置的汽車租給共乘服務司機。該公司由安舒班薩爾和阿布舍克阿羅拉於 2014 年 9 月創立，總部位於加利福尼亞州洛杉磯。
About Getaround
關於吉他宏
(Get Rating)
(取得評分)
Getaround, Inc. provides on-line car rental and peer-to-peer car-sharing services in California. The company's fleet include SUV, hatchback, cargo and passenger minivan, convertible SUV, coupe, crew and extended cab, cargo and passenger van, regular-cab, sedan, and wagon. As of March 31, 2022, it operated approximately 66,000 cars in over 950 cities across 8 countries worldwide, including the United States and across Europe. The company was incorporated in 2009 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.
GetARound, Inc. 在加利福尼亞州提供在線汽車租賃和點對點汽車共享服務。該公司的車隊包括 SUV，掀背車，貨物和客用小型貨車，敞篷 SUV，轎跑車，機組人員和擴展駕駛室，貨物和客車，普通駕駛室，轎車和旅行車。截至 2022 年 3 月 31 日，該公司在全球 8 個國家（包括美國和歐洲）的 950 多個城市運營約 66,000 輛汽車。該公司成立於 2009 年，總部位於加利福尼亞州舊金山。
Receive News & Ratings for HyreCar Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for HyreCar and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
接收《HyReCar 日報》的最新消息和評分 -在下面輸入您的電子郵件地址，以通過 MarketBeat.com 的免費每日電子郵件通訊接收 HyreCar 和相關公司的最新新聞和分析師評級的簡要每日摘要。
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融資訊和交易應用程式。
在美國，moomoo上的投資產品和服務由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供，一家受美國證券交易委員會（SEC）監管的持牌主體。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融業監管局（FINRA）和證券投資者保護公司（SIPC）的成員。
在新加坡，moomoo上的投資產品和服務是通過Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供，該公司受新加坡金融管理局（MAS）監管(牌照號碼︰CMS101000) ，持有資本市場服務牌照 (CMS) ，持有財務顧問豁免（Exempt Financial Adviser）資質。本內容未經新加坡金融管理局的審查。
在澳大利亞，moomoo上的金融產品和服務是通過Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供，該公司是受澳大利亞證券和投資委員會(ASIC)監管的澳大利亞金融服務許可機構（AFSL No. 224663）。請閱讀並理解我們的《金融服務指南》、《條款與條件》、《隱私政策》和其他披露文件，這些文件可在我們的網站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中獲取。
在加拿大，透過moomoo應用程式提供的僅限訂單執行的券商服務由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供，並受加拿大投資監管機構（CIRO）監管。
在馬來西亞，moomoo上的投資產品和服務是透過Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供，該公司受馬來西亞證券監督委員會（SC）監管(牌照號碼︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ，持有資本市場服務牌照 (CMSL) 。本內容未經馬來西亞證券監督委員會的審查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.，Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., 是關聯公司。
風險及免責聲明
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融資訊和交易應用程式。
在美國，moomoo上的投資產品和服務由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供，一家受美國證券交易委員會（SEC）監管的持牌主體。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融業監管局（FINRA）和證券投資者保護公司（SIPC）的成員。
在新加坡，moomoo上的投資產品和服務是通過Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供，該公司受新加坡金融管理局（MAS）監管(牌照號碼︰CMS101000) ，持有資本市場服務牌照 (CMS) ，持有財務顧問豁免（Exempt Financial Adviser）資質。本內容未經新加坡金融管理局的審查。
在澳大利亞，moomoo上的金融產品和服務是通過Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供，該公司是受澳大利亞證券和投資委員會(ASIC)監管的澳大利亞金融服務許可機構（AFSL No. 224663）。請閱讀並理解我們的《金融服務指南》、《條款與條件》、《隱私政策》和其他披露文件，這些文件可在我們的網站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中獲取。
在加拿大，透過moomoo應用程式提供的僅限訂單執行的券商服務由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供，並受加拿大投資監管機構（CIRO）監管。
在馬來西亞，moomoo上的投資產品和服務是透過Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供，該公司受馬來西亞證券監督委員會（SC）監管(牌照號碼︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ，持有資本市場服務牌照 (CMSL) 。本內容未經馬來西亞證券監督委員會的審查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.，Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., 是關聯公司。
- 分享到weixin
- 分享到qq
- 分享到facebook
- 分享到twitter
- 分享到微博
- 粘贴板
使用瀏覽器的分享功能，分享給你的好友吧