share_log

Comparing Erasca (NASDAQ:ERAS) and Longboard Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:LBPH)

Comparing Erasca (NASDAQ:ERAS) and Longboard Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:LBPH)

比較伊拉斯卡 (納斯達克:時代) 和長板製藥 (NASDAQ: LBPH)
Defense World ·  2023/01/19 01:31

Longboard Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:LBPH – Get Rating) and Erasca (NASDAQ:ERAS – Get Rating) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

長板製藥(納斯達克:LBPH-GET Rating)和艾拉斯卡(納斯達克:ERAS-GET Rating)都是小盤醫療公司,但哪隻股票更好?我們將根據這兩家公司的盈利能力、風險、收益、股息、分析師建議、機構所有權和估值等方面的實力進行比較。

Valuation & Earnings

估值與收益

This table compares Longboard Pharmaceuticals and Erasca's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

該表格比較了長板製藥和Erasca的營收、每股收益(EPS)和估值。

Get
到達
Longboard Pharmaceuticals
長板製藥
alerts:
警報:
Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Longboard Pharmaceuticals N/A N/A -$27.80 million ($2.43) -2.35
Erasca N/A N/A -$122.76 million ($1.16) -3.34
總收入 價格/銷售額比 淨收入 每股收益 市盈率
長板製藥 不適用 不適用 -2,780萬元 ($2.43) -2.35
埃拉斯卡 不適用 不適用 -1.2276億美元 ($1.16) -3.34

Erasca is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Longboard Pharmaceuticals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Erasca的市盈率低於Longboard PharmPharmticals,表明它目前是兩隻股票中更負擔得起的一隻。

Profitability

盈利能力

This table compares Longboard Pharmaceuticals and Erasca's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
此表比較了Longboard製藥公司和Erasca公司的淨利潤率、股本回報率和資產回報率。
Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Longboard Pharmaceuticals N/A -46.99% -43.46%
Erasca N/A -33.63% -29.55%
淨利潤率 股本回報率 資產回報率
長板製藥 不適用 -46.99% -43.46%
埃拉斯卡 不適用 -33.63% -29.55%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

機構與內部人持股

53.5% of Longboard Pharmaceuticals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of Erasca shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of Longboard Pharmaceuticals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Erasca shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

長板醫藥53.5%的股份由機構投資者持有。相比之下,65.8%的Erasca股票由機構投資者持有。朗博製藥6.8%的股份由公司內部人士持有。相比之下,Erasca 37.5%的股份由公司內部人士持有。強大的機構持股表明,對衝基金、捐贈基金和大型基金管理公司相信,一家公司的長期表現將好於大盤。

Volatility and Risk

波動性和風險

Longboard Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Erasca has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Long board PharmPharmticals的貝塔係數為1.02,這表明其股價的波動性比標準普爾500指數高2%。相比之下,Erasca的貝塔係數為1.28,這表明其股價的波動性比標準普爾500指數高28%。

Analyst Ratings

分析師評級

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Longboard Pharmaceuticals and Erasca, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

這是由MarketBeat.com提供的Longboard製藥公司和Erasca最近的評級和目標價格細目。

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Longboard Pharmaceuticals 0 0 4 0 3.00
Erasca 0 0 0 0 N/A
銷售評級 保持評級 購買評級 強勁的買入評級 評級分數
長板製藥 0 0 4 0 3.00
埃拉斯卡 0 0 0 0 不適用

Longboard Pharmaceuticals presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 163.16%. Given Longboard Pharmaceuticals' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Longboard Pharmaceuticals is more favorable than Erasca.

Long board PharmPharmticals目前的共識目標價為15美元,暗示潛在上漲163.16%。鑑於Longboard PharmPharmticals可能上漲的可能性更高,研究分析師明確認為,Longboard PharmPharmticals比Erasca更有利。

Summary

摘要

Erasca beats Longboard Pharmaceuticals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Erasca在兩隻股票比較的10個因素中有6個擊敗了Longboard PharmPharmticals。

About Longboard Pharmaceuticals

關於朗博德製藥公司

(Get Rating)

(獲取評級)

Longboard Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, focuses on developing transformative medicines for neurological diseases. The company's lead product candidate is LP352, which is in a Phase 1b/2a clinical trial for the treatment of seizures associated with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Its preclinical product candidates include LP659 and LP143, which focuses on developing therapies for multiple neurological diseases. The company was formerly known as Arena Neuroscience, Inc. and changed its name to Longboard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in October 2020. Longboard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. was incorporated in 2020 and is based in La Jolla, California.

長板製藥公司是一家臨牀階段的生物製藥公司,專注於開發治療神經疾病的變革性藥物。該公司的主要候選產品是LP352,它正處於1b/2a期臨牀試驗,用於治療與發育性和癲癇腦病相關的癲癇發作。它的臨牀前產品候選包括LP659和LP143,後者專注於開發多種神經疾病的治療方法。該公司前身為Arena NeuroScience,Inc.,並於2020年10月更名為Longboard PharmPharmticals,Inc.Long board製藥公司成立於2020年,總部設在加利福尼亞州拉荷亞。

About Erasca

關於伊拉斯卡

(Get Rating)

(獲取評級)

Erasca, Inc., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, focuses on discovering, developing, and commercializing therapies for patients with RAS/MAPK pathway-driven cancers. The company's lead candidates include ERAS-007, an oral inhibitor of ERK1/2 for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and acute myeloid leukemia; and ERAS-601, an oral SHP2 inhibitor for patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. It is also developing ERAS-801, a central nervous system-penetrant EGFR inhibitor for the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. The company was incorporated in 2018 and is headquartered in San Diego, California.

Erasca,Inc.是一家臨牀階段的生物製藥公司,專注於發現、開發和商業化RAS/MAPK途徑驅動的癌症患者的治療方法。該公司的主要候選藥物包括ERK1/2口服抑制劑ERK1/2,用於治療非小細胞肺癌、結直腸癌和急性髓系白血病;以及ERAS-601,一種用於晚期或轉移性實體腫瘤患者的口服SHP2抑制劑。它還在開發ERAS-801,一種中樞神經系統穿透性EGFR抑制劑,用於治療復發的多形性膠質母細胞瘤患者。該公司成立於2018年,總部位於加利福尼亞州聖地亞哥。

Receive News & Ratings for Longboard Pharmaceuticals Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Longboard Pharmaceuticals and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

接受《長板醫藥日報》的新聞和評級-在下面輸入您的電子郵件地址,通過MarketBeat.com的免費每日電子郵件時事通訊接收對Longboard製藥公司和相關公司的最新新聞和分析師評級的每日摘要。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論