share_log

Private Equity Firms Who Own 57% Along With Institutions Invested in Bright Health Group, Inc. (NYSE:BHG) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

Private Equity Firms Who Own 57% Along With Institutions Invested in Bright Health Group, Inc. (NYSE:BHG) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

擁有 57% 的私募股權公司以及投資於光明健康集團股份有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:BHG)的機構上週持有價值上升
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/18 08:05

If you want to know who really controls Bright Health Group, Inc. (NYSE:BHG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private equity firms own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了光明健康集團(紐約證券交易所代碼:BHG),那麼你就得看看它的股票登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,私募股權公司以57%的股權擁有該公司的最大份額。換句話説,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。

While private equity firms were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$156m market cap gain, institutions too had a 20% share in those profits.

儘管私募股權公司是上週1.56億美元市值增長的最大受益者,但機構也在這些利潤中佔有20%的份額。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Bright Health Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於光明健康集團的什麼。

See our latest analysis for Bright Health Group

查看我們對光明健康集團的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BHG Ownership Breakdown January 18th 2023
紐約證券交易所:BHG所有權明細2023年1月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bright Health Group?

關於光明健康集團,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與經常跟蹤的指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常確實會考慮收購被納入相關基準指數的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Bright Health Group. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Bright Health Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在光明健康集團擁有相當多的股份。這意味着為這些機構工作的分析師已經看過了這隻股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,下面是光明健康集團的盈利歷史,值得一看。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BHG Earnings and Revenue Growth January 18th 2023
紐約證券交易所:BHG收益和收入增長2023年1月18日

Bright Health Group is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is New Enterprise Associates, Inc., with ownership of 37%. With 13% and 6.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, Deer Management Company, LLC and StepStone Group Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

光明健康集團不屬於對衝基金。該公司的最大股東是New Enterprise Associates,Inc.,持有37%的股份。Deer Management Company、LLC和StepStone Group Inc.分別持有13%和6.6%的流通股,是第二大和第三大股東。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

為了讓我們的研究更有趣,我們發現,前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。有相當數量的分析師追蹤該股,因此瞭解他們對未來的總體看法可能是有用的。

Insider Ownership Of Bright Health Group

光明健康集團的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Bright Health Group, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$34m worth of the US$653m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士持有光明健康集團的一些股份。作為個人,這些內部人士總共擁有這家市值6.53億美元的公司3400萬美元的股份。有人會説,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但或許值得一查的是,這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Bright Health Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

持有18%股權的普通公眾,主要由個人投資者組成,對光明健康集團有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種規模的所有權可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 57% stake in Bright Health Group. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有光明健康集團57%的股份。這表明,他們可以在關鍵的政策決策中發揮影響力。一些人可能會喜歡這樣,因為私人股本有時是讓管理層承擔責任的積極分子。但在其他時候,私募股權公司讓公司上市後,它們的股票都賣光了。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Bright Health Group has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。以風險為例-光明健康集團2個警告標誌我們認為你應該意識到。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終這就是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者將做得多好。因此,我們認為,看看這份免費報告是明智的,它顯示了分析師是否預測到了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論